The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-coupling in flow
Abstract
Until recently, cross-coupling reactions have been exclusively performed in batch processes. With the advent of microfluidics, significant effort has been devoted to develop a wide variety of continuous-flow techniques to facilitate organic synthesis. In this critical review, we attempt to give an overview of the different continuous-flow methodologies that have been developed and utilized for cross-coupling reactions. In addition, we attempt to point out the advantages of continuous-flow when compared with their batch counterparts (246 references).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Microchemical systems for continuous-flow synthesis
Hartman, R. L., & Jensen, K. F. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b906343a · Cited by 508
Cited by
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K., & Seeberger, P. H. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183 · Cited by 1,995
Continuous‐Flow Solid‐Phase Peptide Synthesis: A Revolutionary Reduction of the Amino Acid Excess
Mándity, I. M., Olasz, B., Ötvös, S. B., & Fülöp, F. (2014) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201402436 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Noël, T., & Buchwald, S. L.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5010
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2043706594
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-coupling in flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1cs15075h
- The paper
- Noël, T., & Buchwald, S. L. (2011). Cross-coupling in flow. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15075h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
