The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stereochemistry of post-transition metal oxides: revision of the classical lone pair model
Open accessAbstract
The chemistry of post transition metals is dominated by the group oxidation state N and a lower N-2 oxidation state, which is associated with occupation of a metal s(2) lone pair, as found in compounds of Tl(I), Pb(II) and Bi(III). The preference of these cations for non-centrosymmetric coordination environments has previously been rationalised in terms of direct hybridisation of metal s and p valence orbitals, thus lowering the internal electronic energy of the N-2 ion. This explanation in terms of an on-site second-order Jahn-Teller effect remains the contemporary textbook explanation. In this tutorial review, we review recent progress in this area, based on quantum chemical calculations and X-ray spectroscopic measurements. This recent work has led to a revised model, which highlights the important role of covalent interaction with oxygen in mediating lone pair formation for metal oxides. The role of the anion p atomic orbital in chemical bonding is key to explaining why chalcogenides display a weaker preference for structural distortions in comparison to oxides and halides. The underlying chemical interactions are responsible for the unique physicochemical properties of oxides containing lone pairs and, in particular, to their application as photocatalysts (BiVO(4)), ferroelectrics (PbTiO(3)), multi-ferroics (BiFeO(3)) and p-type semiconductors (SnO). The exploration of lone pair systems remains a viable a venue for the design of functional multi-component oxide compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0940 · Cited by 14,314
Cited by
He, Y., & Galli, G. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm5026766 · Cited by 359
Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Perdew, J. P., & Wu, X. (2017) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.035143 · Cited by 258
Temperature dependence of dynamic dipole formation in PbTe
Holm, K. A. U., Roth, N., Zeuthen, C. M., Tolborg, K., Feidenhans'l, A. A., & Iversen, B. B. (2020) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.024112 · Cited by 24
Ghosh, A., Paul, S., Das, M., Sarkar, P. K., Bhardwaj, P., Sheet, G., Das, S., Kalimuddin, S., Datta, A., & Acharya, S. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c06297 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, A., Payne, D. J., Egdell, R. G., & Watson, G. W.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4455
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2096867388
- Cited by
- 832
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereochemistry of post-transition metal oxides: revision of the classical lone pair model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1cs15098g
- The paper
- Walsh, A., Payne, D. J., Egdell, R. G., & Watson, G. W. (2011). Stereochemistry of post-transition metal oxides: revision of the classical lone pair model. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15098g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.