The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption
Abstract
Two representative metal–organic frameworks, Zn4O(BTB)2 (BTB3− = 1,3,5-benzenetribenzoate; MOF-177) and Mg2(dobdc) (dobdc4− = 1,4-dioxido-2,5-benzenedicarboxylate; Mg-MOF-74, CPO-27-Mg), are evaluated in detail for their potential use in post-combustion CO2 capture via temperature swing adsorption (TSA). Low-pressure single-component CO2 and N2 adsorption isotherms were measured every 10 °C from 20 to 200 °C, allowing the performance of each material to be analyzed precisely. In order to gain a more complete understanding of the separation phenomena and the thermodynamics of CO2 adsorption, the isotherms were analyzed using a variety of methods. With regard to the isosteric heat of CO2 adsorption, Mg2(dobdc) exhibits an abrupt drop at loadings approaching the saturation of the Mg2+ sites, which has significant implications for regeneration in different industrial applications. The CO2/N2 selectivities were calculated using ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) for MOF-177, Mg2(dobdc), and zeolite NaX, and working capacities were estimated using a simplified TSA model. Significantly, MOF-177 fails to exhibit a positive working capacity even at regeneration temperatures as high as 200 °C, while Mg2(dobdc) reaches a working capacity of 17.6 wt % at this temperature. Breakthrough simulations were also performed for the three materials, demonstrating the superior performance of Mg2(dobdc) over MOF-177 and zeolite NaX. These results show that the presence of strong CO2 adsorption sites is essential for a metal–organic framework to be of utility in post-combustion CO2 capture via a TSA process, and present a methodology for the evaluation of new metal–organic frameworks via analysis of single-component gas adsorption isotherms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
An Amine-Functionalized MIL-53 Metal−Organic Framework with Large Separation Power for CO 2 and CH 4
Couck, S., Denayer, J. F. M., Baron, G. V., Rémy, T., Gascon, J., & Kapteijn, F. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja900555r · Cited by 988
Sumida, K., Horike, S., Kaye, S. S., Herm, Z. R., Queen, W. L., Brown, C. M., Grandjean, F., Long, G. J., Dailly, A., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c0sc00179a · Cited by 347
Self-citation
Cited by
Kökçam-Demir, Ü., Goldman, A., Esrafili, L., Gharib, M., Morsali, A., Weingart, O., & Janiak, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00609e · Cited by 895
Data-driven design of metal–organic frameworks for wet flue gas CO2 capture
Boyd, P. G., Chidambaram, A., García-Díez, E., Ireland, C. P., Daff, T. D., Bounds, R., Gładysiak, A., Schouwink, P., Moosavi, S. M., Maroto-Valer, M. M., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 · Cited by 885
Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage
Ullah Khan, I., Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, M., Hashim, H., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A. F., Rezaei-DashtArzhandi, M., & Wan Azelee, I. (2017) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035 · Cited by 775
He, Y., Krishna, R., & Chen, B. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22858k · Cited by 674
Self-citationAdsorption of Carbon Dioxide for post-combustion capture: a review
Raganati, F., Miccio, F., & Ammendola, P. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618 · Cited by 661
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, J. A., Sumida, K., Herm, Z. R., Krishna, R., & Long, J. R.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3030
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2140743414
- Cited by
- 1,072
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 123.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee01720a
- The paper
- Mason, J. A., Sumida, K., Herm, Z. R., Krishna, R., & Long, J. R. (2011). Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01720a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.