The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the electrical conductivity of microbial nanowires and biofilms
Abstract
Dissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria (DMRB), such as Geobacter and Shewanella spp., occupy a distinct metabolic niche in which they acquire energy by coupling oxidation of organic fuels with reduction of insoluble extracellular electron acceptors (i.e., minerals). Their unique extracellular electron transfer (EET) capabilities extend to reduction of anodes (electrodes maintained at sufficiently positive potentials) on which they form persistent, electric current generating biofilms. One hypothesis describing the mechanism of EET by Geobacter and Shewanella spp. involves superexchange in which electrons are conducted by a succession of electron transfer reactions among redox proteins associated with the outer cell membranes, aligned along pilus-like filaments (e.g.pili), and/or throughout the extracellular matrix. Here we present theory, previously developed to describe superexchange within abiotic redox polymers, to describe superexchange within DMRB biofilms grown on anodes. We show that this theory appears to apply to recent ex situ measurements of electrical conductivity by individual pilus-like filaments of S. oneidensis MR-1 and G. sulfurreducensDL1, referred to as microbial nanowires. Microbial nanowires have received much recent attention because they are thought by some to impart electrical conductivity to DMRB biofilms and because of the prospect of microbe-produced conductive nanomaterials. We also show that this theory appears to apply to preliminary in situ demonstration of electrical conductivity of an anode-grown G. sulfurreducensDL1 biofilm. Based on these results we suggest a role for nanowires of S. oneidensis and G. sulfurreducens in biofilm conductivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) Reduction
Lovley, D. R., Holmes, D. E., & Nevin, K. P. (2004) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(04)49005-5 · Cited by 1,471
Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments
Bond, D. R., Holmes, D. E., Tender, L. M., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066771 · Cited by 1,437
Self-citationNevin, K. P., Kim, B.-C., Glaven, R. H., Johnson, J. P., Woodard, T. L., Methé, B. A., DiDonato, R. J., Covalla, S. F., Franks, A. E., Liu, A., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005628 · Cited by 441
Alignment of the c -Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens
Leang, C., Qian, X., Mester, T., & Lovley, D. R. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00023-10 · Cited by 342
Cited by
Microbial Nanowires: A New Paradigm for Biological Electron Transfer and Bioelectronics
Malvankar, N. S., & Lovley, D. R. (2012) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201100733 · Cited by 316
Fadhil, S. H., & Ismail, Z. Z. (2023) · Bioremediation Journal · doi:10.1080/10889868.2021.1988507 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Strycharz-Glaven, S. M., Snider, R. M., Guiseppi-Elie, A., & Tender, L. M.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4366
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2113216539
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the electrical conductivity of microbial nanowires and biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee01753e
- The paper
- Strycharz-Glaven, S. M., Snider, R. M., Guiseppi-Elie, A., & Tender, L. M. (2011). On the electrical conductivity of microbial nanowires and biofilms. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01753e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.