Cited by 13Microbial Fuel Cells and BioremediationAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAlgal biology and biofuel production

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioremediation of real-field slaughterhouse wastewater associated with power generation in algae-photosynthetic microbial fuel cell

Fadhil, Safa H., Ismail, Zainab Z.·2023·Bioremediation Journal

Abstract

Algae-photosynthetic microbial fuel cell (PMFC) could be considered as a promising approach for producing purified water. This study assessed the performance of an algae-PMFC continuously operated for 120 days to treat and demineralize real-field slaughterhouse wastewater associated with bioenergy generation. Mixed bacterial species including Pseudomonas and Bacillus as the dominant species were used to inoculate the anodic chamber, whereby Chlorella vulgaris microalgae were used in the cathodic section. The results showed that maximum removal efficiency of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonium ions from the actual slaughterhouse wastewater were 99.65% and 70%, respectively. Maximum and average recorded power output were 543.28 and 391.42 mW/m2, respectively. Dense growth of both; the biofilm in the anodic compartment as well as Chlorella vulgaris microalgae in the cathodic compartment were clearly observed after 120-days operation. The promising results of this potential approach encourage the application of PMFC for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10889868.2021.1988507

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A MA-MFC system treating real-field slaughterhouse wastewater over 120 days achieved removal efficiencies of 99.65% for COD and 70% for ammonium ions, and a maximum power output of 543.28 mW m−2.

    “The results showed removal efficiencies of 99.65% for COD and 70% for ammonium ions from the slaughterhouse wastewater, and a maximum power output of 543.28 mW m−2.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fadhil, S. H., & Ismail, Z. Z.
Affiliations
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Corresponding author
Ismail, Zainab Z.
Venue
Bioremediation Journal
Published
2021-10-07
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
75-83
ISSN
  • 1088-9868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-6529
OpenAlex
W3204614972
Cited by
13
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bioremediation Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
Keywords
slaughterhouse wastewater, wastewater treatment, Chlorella vulgaris, COD removal, ammonium removal, bioenergy production, anode biofilm, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, output power, water purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review