The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials
Abstract
To evaluate the potential of Na-ion batteries, we contrast in this work the difference between Na-ion and Li-ion based intercalation chemistries in terms of three key battery properties—voltage, phase stability and diffusion barriers. The compounds investigated comprise the layered AMO2 and AMS2 structures, the olivine and maricite AMPO4 structures, and the NASICON A3V2(PO4)3 structures. The calculated Na voltages for the compounds investigated are 0.18–0.57 V lower than that of the corresponding Li voltages, in agreement with previous experimental data. We believe the observed lower voltages for Na compounds are predominantly a cathodic effect related to the much smaller energy gain from inserting Na into the host structure compared to inserting Li. We also found a relatively strong dependence of battery properties on structural features. In general, the difference between the Na and Li voltage of the same structure, ΔVNa–Li, is less negative for the maricite structures preferred by Na, and more negative for the olivine structures preferred by Li. The layered compounds have the most negative ΔVNa–Li. In terms of phase stability, we found that open structures, such as the layered and NASICON structures, that are better able to accommodate the larger Na+ ion generally have both Na and Li versions of the same compound. For the close-packed AMPO4 structures, our results show that Na generally prefers the maricite structure, while Li prefers the olivine structure, in agreement with previous experimental work. We also found surprising evidence that the barriers for Na+ migration can potentially be lower than that for Li+ migration in the layered structures. Overall, our findings indicate that Na-ion systems can be competitive with Li-ion systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
Cited by
Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis
Ong, S. P., Richards, W. D., Jain, A., Hautier, G., Kocher, M., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Chevrier, V. L., Persson, K. A., & Ceder, G. (2013) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 · Cited by 4,534
Self-citationA 3.8-V earth-abundant sodium battery electrode
Barpanda, P., Oyama, G., Nishimura, S.-I., Chung, S.-C., & Yamada, A. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5358 · Cited by 873
An Amorphous Red Phosphorus/Carbon Composite as a Promising Anode Material for Sodium Ion Batteries
Kim, Y., Park, Y., Choi, A., Choi, N., Kim, J., Lee, J., Ryu, J. H., Oh, S. M., & Lee, K. T. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201204877 · Cited by 854
A zero-strain layered metal oxide as the negative electrode for long-life sodium-ion batteries
Wang, Y., Yu, X., Xu, S., Bai, J., Xiao, R., Hu, Y.-S., Li, H., Yang, X.-Q., Chen, L., & Huang, X. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3365 · Cited by 616
A Critical Review of Machine Learning of Energy Materials
Chen, C., Zuo, Y., Ye, W., Li, X., Deng, Z., & Ong, S. P. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903242 · Cited by 609
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ong, S. P., Chevrier, V. L., Hautier, G., Jain, A., Moore, C., Kim, S., Ma, X., & Ceder, G.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3680
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2067381514
- Cited by
- 1,415
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee01782a
- The paper
- Ong, S. P., Chevrier, V. L., Hautier, G., Jain, A., Moore, C., Kim, S., Ma, X., & Ceder, G. (2011). Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01782a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.