Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials

Ong, Shyue Ping, Chevrier, Vincent L., Hautier, Geoffroy, Jain, Anubhav, Moore, Charles, Kim, Sangtae, Ma, Xiaohua, Ceder, Gerbrand·2011·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

To evaluate the potential of Na-ion batteries, we contrast in this work the difference between Na-ion and Li-ion based intercalation chemistries in terms of three key battery properties—voltage, phase stability and diffusion barriers. The compounds investigated comprise the layered AMO2 and AMS2 structures, the olivine and maricite AMPO4 structures, and the NASICON A3V2(PO4)3 structures. The calculated Na voltages for the compounds investigated are 0.18–0.57 V lower than that of the corresponding Li voltages, in agreement with previous experimental data. We believe the observed lower voltages for Na compounds are predominantly a cathodic effect related to the much smaller energy gain from inserting Na into the host structure compared to inserting Li. We also found a relatively strong dependence of battery properties on structural features. In general, the difference between the Na and Li voltage of the same structure, ΔVNa–Li, is less negative for the maricite structures preferred by Na, and more negative for the olivine structures preferred by Li. The layered compounds have the most negative ΔVNa–Li. In terms of phase stability, we found that open structures, such as the layered and NASICON structures, that are better able to accommodate the larger Na+ ion generally have both Na and Li versions of the same compound. For the close-packed AMPO4 structures, our results show that Na generally prefers the maricite structure, while Li prefers the olivine structure, in agreement with previous experimental work. We also found surprising evidence that the barriers for Na+ migration can potentially be lower than that for Li+ migration in the layered structures. Overall, our findings indicate that Na-ion systems can be competitive with Li-ion systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1ee01782a

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,415

Metadata

Authors
Ong, S. P., Chevrier, V. L., Hautier, G., Jain, A., Moore, C., Kim, S., Ma, X., & Ceder, G.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2011
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
3680
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2067381514
Cited by
1,415
References
2
FWCI
44.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee01782a
The paper
Ong, S. P., Chevrier, V. L., Hautier, G., Jain, A., Moore, C., Kim, S., Ma, X., & Ceder, G. (2011). Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01782a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.