The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In situ TEM electrochemistry of anode materials in lithium ion batteries
Abstract
We created the first nanobattery inside a transmission electron microscope (TEM), allowing for real time and atomic scale observations of battery charging and discharging processes. Two types of nanobattery cells, one based on room temperature ionic liquid electrolytes (ILEs) and the other based on all solid components, were created. The former consists of a single nanowire anode, an ILE and a bulk LiCoO2 cathode; the latter uses Li2O as a solid electrolyte and metal Li as the anode. Some of the important latest results obtained by using the nanobattery setup are summarized here: (1) upon charging SnO2 nanowires in an ILE cell with one end of the nanowire contacting the electrolyte, a reaction front propagates progressively along the nanowire, causing the nanowire to swell, elongate, and spiral. The reaction front is a “Medusa zone” containing a high density of mobile dislocations, which continuously nucleate at the moving front and absorbed from behind. This dislocation cloud indicates large in-plane misfit stresses and is a structural precursor to electrochemically driven solid-state amorphization. When the nanowire is immersed in the electrolyte (in a flooding geometry), a multiple-strip-multiple-reaction-front lithiation mechanism operates. (2) Upon charging <112>-oriented Si nanowires, the nanowires swell rather than elongate. We found unexpectedly the highly anisotropic volume expansion in lithiated Si nanowires, resulting in a surprising dumbbell-shaped cross-section, which developed due to plastic flow and necking instability. Driven by progressive charging, the stress concentration at the neck region led to cracking and eventually fracture of the single nanowire into sub-wires. Moreover, the fully lithiated phase was found to be crystalline Li15Si4, rather than the widely believed Li22Si5 phase, indicating the maximum capacity of Si being 3579 mA h g−1 at room temperature. (3) Carbon coating not only increases rate performance but also alters the lithiation induced strain of SnO2 nanowires. The SnO2 nanowires coated with carbon can be charged about 10 times faster than the non-coated ones. Intriguingly, the radial expansion of the coated nanowires was completely suppressed, resulting in enormously reduced tensile stress at the reaction front, as evidenced by the lack of formation of dislocations. (4) The lithiation process of individual Si nanoparticles was observed in real time in a TEM. A strong size dependent fracture behaviour was discovered, i.e., there exists a critical particle size with a diameter of ∼150 nm, below which the particles neither cracked nor fractured upon lithiation, above which the particles first formed cracks and then fractured due to lithiation induced huge volume expansion. For very large particles with size over 900 nm, electrochemical lithiation induced explosion of Si particles was observed. This strong size-dependent fracture behaviour is attributed to the competition between the stored mechanical energy and the crack propagation energy of the nanoparticles: smaller nanoparticles cannot store enough mechanical energy to drive crack propagation. These results indicate the strong material, size and crystallographic orientation dependent electrochemical behaviour of anode materials, highlighting the powerfulness of in situTEM electrochemistry, which provides not only deep understanding of the fundamental sciences of lithium ion batteries but also critical guidance in developing advanced lithium ion battery for electrical vehicle and backup power for fluctuation energy sources such as wind and solar energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Orsini, F., Du Pasquier, A., Beaudoin, B., Tarascon, J. M., Trentin, M., Langenhuizen, N., De Beer, E., & Notten, P. (1998) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(98)00128-1 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Size-Dependent Fracture of Silicon Nanoparticles During Lithiation
Liu, X. H., Zhong, L., Huang, S., Mao, S. X., Zhu, T., & Huang, J. Y. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn204476h · Cited by 2,376
Self-citationNanowires for Electrochemical Energy Storage
Zhou, G., Xu, L., Hu, G., Mai, L., & Cui, Y. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00326 · Cited by 439
Fracture of crystalline silicon nanopillars during electrochemical lithium insertion
Lee, S. W., McDowell, M. T., Berla, L. A., Nix, W. D., & Cui, Y. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201088109 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X. H., & Huang, J. Y.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3844
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2122164055
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ TEM electrochemistry of anode materials in lithium ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee01918j
- The paper
- Liu, X. H., & Huang, J. Y. (2011). In situ TEM electrochemistry of anode materials in lithium ion batteries. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01918j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.