The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation on the fire-induced hazards of Li-ion battery cells by fire calorimetry
Abstract
The use of the high energy Li-ion battery technology for emerging markets like electromobility requires precise appraisal of their safety levels in abuse conditions. Combustion tests were performed on commercial pouch cells by means of the Fire Propagation Apparatus also called Tewarson calorimeter in the EU, so far used to study flammability parameters of polymers and chemicals. Well-controlled conditions for cell combustion are created in such an apparatus with the opportunity to analyse standard decomposition/combustion gases and therefore to quantify thermal and toxic threat parameters governing the fire risk namely the rate of heat release and the effective heat of combustion as well as the toxic product releases. Using the method of O2 consumption, total combustion heats and its kinetic of production were determined as a function of the cell state of charge unveiling an explosion risk in the case of a charged cell. The resulting combustion heat is revealed to be consistent with cumulated contribution values pertaining to each organic part of the cell (polymers and electrolytes) as calculated from thermodynamic data. The first order evaluation of the dangerousness of toxic gases resulting from fire induced combustion such as HF, CO, NO, SO2 and HCl was undertaken and stressed the fact that HF is the most critical gas originating from F-containing cell components in our test conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
A review of hazards associated with primary lithium and lithium-ion batteries
Lisbona, D., & Snee, T. (2011) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2011.06.022 · Cited by 701
Runaway risk of forming toxic compounds
Hammami, A., Raymond, N., & Armand, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/424635b · Cited by 346
Cited by
A review of lithium ion battery failure mechanisms and fire prevention strategies
Wang, Q., Mao, B., Stoliarov, S. I., & Sun, J. (2019) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2019.03.002 · Cited by 1,755
Potential of lithium-ion batteries in renewable energy
Diouf, B., & Pode, R. (2015) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.058 · Cited by 1,120
Environmental impacts, pollution sources and pathways of spent lithium-ion batteries
Mrozik, W., Rajaeifar, M. A., Heidrich, O., & Christensen, P. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00691f · Cited by 1,028
A Review of Battery Fires in Electric Vehicles
Sun, P., Bisschop, R., Niu, H., & Huang, X. (2020) · Fire Technology · doi:10.1007/s10694-019-00944-3 · Cited by 891
In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway
Finegan, D. P., Scheel, M., Robinson, J. B., Tjaden, B., Hunt, I., Mason, T. J., Millichamp, J., Di Michiel, M., Offer, G. J., Hinds, G., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7924 · Cited by 844
Metadata
- Authors
- Ribière, P., Grugeon, S., Morcrette, M., Boyanov, S., Laruelle, S., & Marlair, G.
- Venue
- Energy Environ. Sci.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5271-5280
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W1975752698
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation on the fire-induced hazards of Li-ion battery cells by fire calorimetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1ee02218k
- The paper
- Ribière, P., Grugeon, S., Morcrette, M., Boyanov, S., Laruelle, S., & Marlair, G. (2012). Investigation on the fire-induced hazards of Li-ion battery cells by fire calorimetry. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee02218k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.