The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimization of mesoporous carbon structures for lithium–sulfur battery applications
Abstract
Mesoporous carbon (MC) with tunable pore sizes (22 nm, 12 nm, 7 nm, and 3 nm) and pore volumes (from 1.3 to 4.8 cm3 g−1) containing sulfur in the pores was studied as a mesoporous carbon–sulfur (MCS) composite electrode for lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. Systematic investigation of these MCS composites reveals that MC with a larger pore volume can hold a higher maximum sulfur loading, but overall the battery performance is very similar for different MCS composites at full sulfur-filling conditions (i.e., the condition at which the sulfur loading approaches the maximum limit set by the pore volume of the individual MC and, therefore, the pores of each MC are fully filled by sulfur). For the same MC, partial sulfur-filling (i.e., the condition at which the sulfur loading is lower than the maximum limit and, therefore, the pores are only partially filled with sulfur) leads to an improved initial discharge capacity and cycle stability, probably because of improved electrical and ionic transport during electrochemical reactions. Based on this understanding, an MCS composite electrode using MC with a large pore volume, partial sulfur filling, and a novel surface modification was designed for Li–S batteries. An initial capacity of ∼1390 mA h g−1 (based on sulfur) and a capacity retention of ∼840 mA h g−1 over 100 cycles at a 0.1 C rate were obtained using MC (22 nm, 4.8 cm3 g−1) with 50 wt% sulfur loading and a commercially available Clevios P (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDT/PSS)) coating.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Porous electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries–how to prepare them and what makes them special
Vu, A., Qian, Y., & Stein, A. (2012) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201200320 · Cited by 719
Mao, Y., Li, G., Guo, Y., Li, Z., Liang, C., Peng, X., & Lin, Z. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14628 · Cited by 518
From lithium to sodium: Cell chemistry of room temperature sodium–air and sodium–sulfur batteries
Adelhelm, P., Hartmann, P., Bender, C. L., Busche, M., Eufinger, C., & Janek, J. (2015) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.105 · Cited by 478
Porous membranes in secondary battery technologies
Lu, W., Yuan, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00823b · Cited by 479
Self-citationLu, S., Cheng, Y., Wu, X., & Liu, J. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl400543y · Cited by 319
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Cao, Y., Qi, W., Saraf, L. V., Xiao, J., Nie, Z., Mietek, J., Zhang, J.-G., Schwenzer, B., & Liu, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 16603
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2022253997
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of mesoporous carbon structures for lithium–sulfur battery applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1jm12979a
- The paper
- Li, X., Cao, Y., Qi, W., Saraf, L. V., Xiao, J., Nie, Z., Mietek, J., Zhang, J.-G., Schwenzer, B., & Liu, J. (2011). Optimization of mesoporous carbon structures for lithium–sulfur battery applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12979a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.