Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 540

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics

Pekin, Deniz, Skhiri, Yousr, Baret, Jean-Christophe, Le Corre, Delphine, Mazutis, Linas, Ben Salem, Chaouki, Millot, Florian, El Harrak, Abdeslam, Hutchison, J. Brian, Larson, Jonathan W., Link, Darren R., Laurent-Puig, Pierre, Griffiths, Andrew D., Taly, Valérie·2011·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

Somatic mutations within tumoral DNA can be used as highly specific biomarkers to distinguish cancer cells from their normal counterparts. These DNA biomarkers are potentially useful for the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and follow-up of patients. In order to have the required sensitivity and specificity to detect rare tumoral DNA in stool, blood, lymph and other patient samples, a simple, sensitive and quantitative procedure to measure the ratio of mutant to wild-type genes is required. However, techniques such as dual probe TaqMan(®) assays and pyrosequencing, while quantitative, cannot detect less than ∼1% mutant genes in a background of non-mutated DNA from normal cells. Here we describe a procedure allowing the highly sensitive detection of mutated DNA in a quantitative manner within complex mixtures of DNA. The method is based on using a droplet-based microfluidic system to perform digital PCR in millions of picolitre droplets. Genomic DNA (gDNA) is compartmentalized in droplets at a concentration of less than one genome equivalent per droplet together with two TaqMan(®) probes, one specific for the mutant and the other for the wild-type DNA, which generate green and red fluorescent signals, respectively. After thermocycling, the ratio of mutant to wild-type genes is determined by counting the ratio of green to red droplets. We demonstrate the accurate and sensitive quantification of mutated KRAS oncogene in gDNA. The technique enabled the determination of mutant allelic specific imbalance (MASI) in several cancer cell-lines and the precise quantification of a mutated KRAS gene in the presence of a 200,000-fold excess of unmutated KRAS genes. The sensitivity is only limited by the number of droplets analyzed. Furthermore, by one-to-one fusion of drops containing gDNA with any one of seven different types of droplets, each containing a TaqMan(®) probe specific for a different KRAS mutation, or wild-type KRAS, and an optical code, it was possible to screen the six common mutations in KRAS codon 12 in parallel in a single experiment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1lc20128j

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 540

Metadata

Authors
Pekin, D., Skhiri, Y., Baret, J.-C., Le Corre, D., Mazutis, L., Ben Salem, C., Millot, F., El Harrak, A., Hutchison, J. B., Larson, J. W., Link, D. R., Laurent-Puig, P., Griffiths, A. D., & Taly, V.
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2011
Volume
11
Issue
13
Pages
2156
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2026125236
Cited by
540
References
6
FWCI
20.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1lc20128j
The paper
Pekin, D., Skhiri, Y., Baret, J.-C., Le Corre, D., Mazutis, L., Ben Salem, C., Millot, F., El Harrak, A., Hutchison, J. B., Larson, J. W., Link, D. R., Laurent-Puig, P., Griffiths, A. D., & Taly, V. (2011). Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20128j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.