Cited by 295Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsBiosensors and Analytical DetectionElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies

Digital PCR on a SlipChip

Open access
Shen, Feng, Du, Wenbin, Kreutz, Jason E., Fok, Alice, Ismagilov, Rustem F.·2010·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

This paper describes a SlipChip to perform digital PCR in a very simple and inexpensive format. The fluidic path for introducing the sample combined with the PCR mixture was formed using elongated wells in the two plates of the SlipChip designed to overlap during sample loading. This fluidic path was broken up by simple slipping of the two plates that removed the overlap among wells and brought each well in contact with a reservoir preloaded with oil to generate 1280 reaction compartments (2.6 nL each) simultaneously. After thermal cycling, end-point fluorescence intensity was used to detect the presence of nucleic acid. Digital PCR on the SlipChip was tested quantitatively by using Staphylococcus aureus genomic DNA. As the concentration of the template DNA in the reaction mixture was diluted, the fraction of positive wells decreased as expected from the statistical analysis. No cross-contamination was observed during the experiments. At the extremes of the dynamic range of digital PCR the standard confidence interval determined using a normal approximation of the binomial distribution is not satisfactory. Therefore, statistical analysis based on the score method was used to establish these confidence intervals. The SlipChip provides a simple strategy to count nucleic acids by using PCR. It may find applications in research applications such as single cell analysis, prenatal diagnostics, and point-of-care diagnostics. SlipChip would become valuable for diagnostics, including applications in resource-limited areas after integration with isothermal nucleic acid amplification technologies and visual readout.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c004521g

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SlipChip is especially appropriate for integrated DNA-based data storage because all microdroplets can be moved simultaneously by sliding, so no valves, pumps, or tubes are required.

    “As a microfluidic device for handling a large array of microdroplets, SlipChip is a platform that is especially appropriate for the development of an integrated DNA-based data storage system. All the microdroplets can be moved simultaneously on a SlipChip by simply sliding the device, so no valves, pumps, or tubes are required (54–56).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [36]Clopper CJ Pearson ES Biometrika 1934 26 404 413
  2. [55]White RA Blainey PC Fan HC Quake SR BMC Genomics 2009 10 116 19298667 PMC2667538

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, F., Du, W., Kreutz, J. E., Fok, A., & Ismagilov, R. F.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Ismagilov, Rustem F.
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2010
Volume
10
Issue
20
Pages
2666
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2150204651
Cited by
295
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lab on a Chip (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD003584)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Keywords
digital PCR, SlipChip, microfluidics, droplet formation, fluorescence detection, DNA quantification, scoring methods, confidence intervals, low-cost diagnostics, point-of-care testing, resource-limited settings
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, DNA, Bacterial, Equipment Design, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Staphylococcus aureus, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Equipment Failure Analysis, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review