Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 143Science Education and PedagogyChemistry Education and ResearchVarious Chemistry Research Topics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks

Gkitzia, Vasiliki, Salta, Katerina, Tzougraki, Chryssa·2011·Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
DOI 10.1039/c1rp90003j
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study of Chemistry deals essentially with three types of chemical representations: macro, submicro, and symbolic. Research has consistently shown that students experience difficulties in understanding and interpreting the representations, in making translations between different types of representations, and in constructing them. In this study, we conducted a detailed review of existing presuppositions that define what Chemical Representations are to be included in school textbooks for the purpose of enhancing the student’s understanding of Chemistry. We then conducted a detailed analysis of the Chemical Representations included in five Chemistry textbooks. The detailed analysis revealed five criteria for the evaluation of chemical representation used in school textbooks. These criteria (C1-C5) are: (C1) the type of the representation; (C2) the interpretation of the surface features; (C3) their relationship to the text; (C4) the existence and the properties of a caption; (C5) the degree of correlation between the components comprising a multiple representation. The utility of the proposed criteria was then checked against a 10th-grade Greek chemistry textbook. The five criteria cover the basic elements required for a better utilization of chemical representations in the understanding of Chemistry. The five criteria can also be used for the analysis of existing school textbooks and as an authoring tool in designing new Chemistry textbooks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c1rp90003j

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C.
ORCID
Tzougraki, Chryssa
Venue
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2011
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
5-14
ISSN
  • 1109-4028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-1108
DOI
10.1039/c1rp90003j
OpenAlex
W2171173842
Cited by
116
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemistry Education Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Various Chemistry Research Topics
Keywords
chemical representation, evaluation criteria, multiple representations, representation translation, textbook analysis, textbook authoring, chemistry education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.