The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structural design principles for self-assembled coordination polygons and polyhedra
Abstract
Strategies for the design of ligands that combine with metal ions to form high-symmetry coordination assemblies are reviewed. Evaluation of crystal structure evidence reveals that prior design approaches, based on the concept of complementary bonding vector angles, fail to predict the majority of known examples. After explaining the reasons for this failure, it is shown how an alternative approach, de novo structure-based design, provides a practical method that predicts a much wider range of component shapes encoded to direct the formation of such assemblies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beuerle, F., & Gole, B. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201710190 · Cited by 528
Chakraborty, S., & Newkome, G. R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00030a · Cited by 375
Ring Closure To Form Metal Chelates in 3D Fragment-Based de Novo Design
Foscato, M., Houghton, B. J., Occhipinti, G., Deeth, R. J., & Jensen, V. R. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00424 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, N. J., & Hay, B. P.
- Venue
- Chem. Commun.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1354-1379
- ISSN
- 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2062435826
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural design principles for self-assembled coordination polygons and polyhedra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2cc37776d
- The paper
- Young, N. J., & Hay, B. P. (2013). Structural design principles for self-assembled coordination polygons and polyhedra. Chem. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc37776d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.