The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent developments in asymmetric multicomponent reactions
Abstract
Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) receive increasing attention because they address both diversity and complexity in organic synthesis. Thus, in principle diverse sets of relatively complex structures can be generated from simple starting materials in a single reaction step. The ever increasing need for optically pure compounds for pharmaceutical and agricultural applications as well as for catalysis promotes the development of asymmetric multicomponent reactions. In recent years, asymmetric multicomponent reactions have been applied to the total synthesis of various enantiopure natural products and commercial drugs, reducing the number of required reaction steps significantly. Although many developments in diastereoselective MCRs have been reported, the field of catalytic enantioselective MCRs has just started to blossom. This critical review describes developments in both diastereoselective and catalytic enantioselective multicomponent reactions since 2004. Significantly broadened scopes, new techniques, more environmentally benign methods and entirely novel MCRs reflect the increasingly inventive paths that synthetic chemist follow in this field. Until recently, enantioselective transition metal-catalyzed MCRs represented the majority of catalytic enantioselective MCRs. However, metal contamination is highly undesirable for drug synthesis. The emergence of organocatalysis greatly influences the quest for new asymmetric MCRs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tornøe, C. W., Christensen, C., & Meldal, M. (2002) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo011148j · Cited by 8,696
Cited by
Liu, P., Hao, J.-W., Mo, L.-P., & Zhang, Z.-H. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra05746a · Cited by 663
Green Chemistry in the Synthesis of Pharmaceuticals
Kar, S., Sanderson, H., Roy, K., Benfenati, E., & Leszczynski, J. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00631 · Cited by 566
Recent applications of multicomponent reactions in medicinal chemistry
Slobbe, P., Ruijter, E., & Orru, R. V. A. (2012) · MedChemComm · doi:10.1039/c2md20089a · Cited by 484
Self-citationCheng, T., Zhang, D., Li, H., & Liu, G. (2014) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/c4gc00458b · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- de Graaff, C., Ruijter, E., & Orru, R. V. A.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3969
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2071851966
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.