The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comprehensive comparison of transition-metal and actinyl polyoxometalates
Abstract
While the d(0) transition-metal POMs of Group V (V(5+), Nb(5+), Ta(5+)) and Group VI (Mo(6+), W(6+)) have been known for more than a century, the actinyl peroxide POMs, specifically those built of uranyl triperoxide or uranyl dihydroxidediperoxide polyhedra, were only realized within the last decade. While virtually every metal on the Periodic Table can form discrete clusters of some type, the actinyls are the only-in addition to the transition-metal POMs- whose chemistry is dictated by the prevalence of the 'yl' oxygen ligand. Thus this emerging structural, solution, and computational chemistry of actinide POMs warrants comparison to the mature chemistry of transition-metal POMs. This assessment between the transition-metal POMs and actinyl POMs (uranyl peroxide POMs, specifically) has provided much insight to the similarities and differences between these two chemistries. We further break down the comparison between the alkaline POMs of Nb and Ta; and the acidic POMs of V, Mo and W. This more indepth literature review and discussion reveals that while an initial evaluation suggests the actinyl POMs are more akin to the alkaline transition-metal POMs, they actually share characteristics unique to the acidic POMs as well. This tutorial review is meant to provide fodder for deriving new POM chemistries of both the familiar transition-metals and the emerging actinides, as well as fostering communication and collaboration between the two scientific communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress and challenges in polyoxometalate-based catalysis and catalytic materials chemistry
Hill, C. L. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2006.08.042 · Cited by 358
Polyoxoniobate chemistry in the 21st century
Nyman, M. (2011) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c1dt10435g · Cited by 322
Self-citationBurns, P. C., Kubatko, K., Sigmon, G., Fryer, B. J., Gagnon, J. E., Antonio, M. R., & Soderholm, L. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200462445 · Cited by 280
Self-citationCruywagen, J. J. (1999) · Advances in Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0898-8838(08)60270-6 · Cited by 242
Ettedgui, J., Diskin-Posner, Y., Weiner, L., & Neumann, R. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja1078199 · Cited by 220
Direct Observation of Contact Ion‐Pair Formation in Aqueous Solution
Antonio, M. R., Nyman, M., & Anderson, T. M. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200805323 · Cited by 141
Self-citationNyman, M., Alam, T. M., Bonhomme, F., Rodriguez, M. A., Frazer, C. S., & Welk, M. E. (2006) · Journal of Cluster Science · doi:10.1007/s10876-006-0049-x · Cited by 140
Self-citationAn experimental study of magnesium-isotope fractionation in chlorophyll-a photosynthesis
Black, J. R., Yin, Q., & Casey, W. H. (2006) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.010 · Cited by 135
The First Framework Solid Composed of Vanadosilicate Clusters
Tripathi, A., Hughbanks, T. R., & Clearfield, A. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0365173 · Cited by 126
On the Origin of the Cation Templated Self-Assembly of Uranyl-Peroxide Nanoclusters
Miró, P., Pierrefixe, S. C. A. H., Gicquel, M., Gil, A., & Bó, C. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja1053175 · Cited by 110
Solid-State Structural Characterization of a Rigid Framework of Lacunary Heteropolyniobates
Nyman, M., Celestian, A. J., Parise, J. B., Holland, G. P., & Alam, T. M. (2006) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic051155g · Cited by 101
Self-citationSoluble Heteropolyniobates from the Bottom of Group IA
Hou, Y., Nyman, M., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201104478 · Cited by 93
Self-citationAnderson, T. M., Thoma, S. G., Bonhomme, F., Rodriguez, M. A., Park, H., Parise, J. B., Alam, T. M., Larentzos, J. P., & Nyman, M. (2007) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/cg0606904 · Cited by 89
Self-citationSoluble Heteropolyniobates from the Bottom of Group IA
Hou, Y., Nyman, M., & Rodriguez, M. A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.201104478 · Cited by 80
Self-citationSelf-Assembly of Alkali-Uranyl-Peroxide Clusters
Nyman, M., Rodriguez, M. A., & Campana, C. F. (2010) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic1005192 · Cited by 58
Self-citationChiang, M., Antonio, M. R., & Soderholm, L. (2004) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/b412337a · Cited by 28
Chiang, M., Antonio, M. R., Williams, C. W., & Soderholm, L. (2004) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/b315334g · Cited by 27
Cited by
Beyond Charge Balance: Counter‐Cations in Polyoxometalate Chemistry
Misra, A., Kozma, K., Streb, C., & Nyman, M. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201905600 · Cited by 482
Self-citationWalshe, A., Fang, J., Maron, L., & Baker, R. J. (2013) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic401275e · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Nyman, M., & Burns, P. C.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7354
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2028035263
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
