Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,810

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modifying enzyme activity and selectivity by immobilization

Rodrigues, Rafael C., Ortiz, Claudia, Berenguer-Murcia, Ángel, Torres, Rodrigo, Fernández-Lafuente, Roberto·2013·Chem. Soc. Rev.
DOI 10.1039/c2cs35231a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Immobilization of enzymes may produce alterations in their observed activity, specificity or selectivity. Although in many cases an impoverishment of the enzyme properties is observed upon immobilization (caused by the distortion of the enzyme due to the interaction with the support) in some instances such properties may be enhanced by this immobilization. These alterations in enzyme properties are sometimes associated with changes in the enzyme structure. Occasionally, these variations will be positive. For example, they may be related to the stabilization of a hyperactivated form of the enzyme, like in the case of lipases immobilized on hydrophobic supports via interfacial activation. In some other instances, these improvements will be just a consequence of random modifications in the enzyme properties that in some reactions will be positive while in others may be negative. For this reason, the preparation of a library of biocatalysts as broad as possible may be a key turning point to find an immobilized biocatalyst with improved properties when compared to the free enzyme. Immobilized enzymes will be dispersed on the support surface and aggregation will no longer be possible, while the free enzyme may suffer aggregation, which greatly decreases enzyme activity. Moreover, enzyme rigidification may lead to preservation of the enzyme properties under drastic conditions in which the enzyme tends to become distorted thus decreasing its activity. Furthermore, immobilization of e…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2cs35231a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Schmid, 2001, Nature, 409, 258, 10.1038/35051736 · DOI
  2. Katchalski-Katzir, 1993, Trends Biotechnol., 11, 471, 10.1016/0167-7799(93)90080-S · DOI
  3. Hartmeier, 1985, Trends Biotechnol., 3, 149, 10.1016/0167-7799(85)90104-0 · DOI
  4. Torres-Salas, 2011, Adv. Mater., 23, 5275, 10.1002/adma.201101821 · DOI
  5. Sheldon, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 1289, 10.1002/adsc.200700082 · DOI
  6. Iyer, 2008, Process Biochem., 43, 1019, 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fernandez-Lafuente, 2009, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 45, 405, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.08.009 · DOI
  8. Rodrigues, 2011, Adv. Synth. Catal., 353, 2216, 10.1002/adsc.201100163 · DOI
  9. Cowan, 2011, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 49, 326, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.06.023 · DOI
  10. Hernandez, 2011, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 48, 107, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.10.003 · DOI
  11. Mateo, 2007, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40, 1451, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.01.018 · DOI
  12. Hanefeld, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 453, 10.1039/B711564B · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hudson, 2005, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 16, 637, 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.10.004 · DOI
  14. Garcia-Galan, 2011, Adv. Synth. Catal., 353, 2885, 10.1002/adsc.201100534 · DOI
  15. Ghanbari, 2006, Curr. Drug Metab., 7, 315, 10.2174/138920006776359293 · DOI
  16. Ciulli, 2007, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 18, 489, 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.09.003 · DOI
  17. Cowan, 1987, Int. J. Biochem., 19, 483, 10.1016/0020-711X(87)90073-5 · DOI
  18. Pessela, 2003, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 33, 199, 10.1016/S0141-0229(03)00120-0 · DOI
  19. Fernandez-Lafuente, 1995, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 101, 91, 10.1016/1381-1169(95)00050-X · DOI
  20. Polizzi, 2007, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 11, 220, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.685 · DOI
  21. Gianfreda, 1991, Mol. Cell. Biochem., 100, 97, 10.1007/BF00234161 · DOI
  22. Mogensen, 2005, Biochemistry, 44, 1719, 10.1021/bi0479757 · DOI
  23. Mateo, 2006, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 39, 274, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.014 · DOI
  24. Bechtold, 2012, Chem. Eng. Sci., 80, 435, 10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.030 · DOI
  25. Mateo, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 38, 154, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2005.12.007 · DOI
  26. Brady, 2009, Biotechnol. Lett., 31, 1639, 10.1007/s10529-009-0076-4 · DOI
  27. Hernandez, 2011, Process Biochem., 46, 873, 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.12.007 · DOI
  28. Abian, 2003, Biotechnol. Prog., 19, 1639, 10.1021/bp0340786 · DOI
  29. Hobbs, 2007, Chem. Rev., 107, 2786, 10.1021/cr0683820 · DOI
  30. Spiess, 2001, Biotechnol. Prog., 17, 294, 10.1021/bp000149e · DOI
  31. Tischer, 1999, Trends Biotechnol., 17, 326, 10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01322-0 · DOI
  32. Guisan, 1994, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 20, 357, 10.1111/j.1470-8744.1994.tb00323.x · DOI
  33. Lopez-Gallego, 2010, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 14, 174, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.11.023 · DOI
  34. Rocha-Martín, 2012, ChemCatChem, 4, 1279, 10.1002/cctc.201200146 · DOI
  35. Verger, 1997, Trends Biotechnol., 15, 32, 10.1016/S0167-7799(96)10064-0 · DOI
  36. Chu, 1983, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 223, 543, 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90619-7 · DOI
  37. Brzozowski, 2000, Biochemistry, 39, 15071, 10.1021/bi0013905 · DOI
  38. Brzozowski, 1991, Nature, 351, 491, 10.1038/351491a0 · DOI
  39. Fernandez-Lafuente, 1998, Chem. Phys. Lipids, 93, 185, 10.1016/S0009-3084(98)00042-5 · DOI
  40. Fernández-Lorente, 2006, Biomacromolecules, 7, 2610, 10.1021/bm060408+ · DOI
  41. Mingarro, 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 92, 3308, 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3308 · DOI
  42. Palomo, 2003, Biomacromolecules, 4, 1, 10.1021/bm025729+ · DOI
  43. Tang, 1997, Chem. Biol., 4, 453, 10.1016/S1074-5521(97)90197-6 · DOI
  44. McMorn, 2004, Chem. Soc. Rev., 33, 108, 10.1039/b200387m · DOI
  45. Palomo, 2009, Curr. Org. Synth., 6, 1, 10.2174/157017909787314885 · DOI
  46. Kasche, 1986, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 8, 4, 10.1016/0141-0229(86)90003-7 · DOI
  47. Volpato, 2010, Curr. Med. Chem., 17, 3855, 10.2174/092986710793205435 · DOI
  48. Fukuda, 2001, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 92, 405, 10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80288-7 · DOI
  49. Rodrigues, 2010, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 66, 15, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.03.008 · DOI
  50. Hernandez, 2011, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 49, 72, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.03.002 · DOI
  51. Palomo, 2005, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 16, 869, 10.1016/j.tetasy.2004.12.027 · DOI
  52. Palomo, 2002, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 13, 2653, 10.1016/S0957-4166(02)00754-1 · DOI
  53. Masuda, 2001, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 57, 494, 10.1007/s002530100803 · DOI
  54. Lotti, 1993, Gene, 124, 45, 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90760-Z · DOI
  55. Uppenberg, 1994, J. Mol. Biol., 235, 790, 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1035 · DOI
  56. Carrasco-López, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 4365, 10.1074/jbc.M808268200 · DOI
  57. Mateo, 2007, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 35, 1593, 10.1042/BST0351593 · DOI
  58. Pessela, 2005, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 37, 295, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.04.021 · DOI
  59. Barbosa, 2012, Process Biochem., 47, 1220, 10.1016/j.procbio.2012.04.019 · DOI
  60. Barbosa, 2011, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 71, 124, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2011.04.008 · DOI
  61. Fernández-Lafuente, 1998, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 23, 305, 10.1016/S0141-0229(98)00053-2 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, R. C., Ortiz, C., Berenguer-Murcia, Á., Torres, R., & Fernández-Lafuente, R.
Venue
Chem. Soc. Rev.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2013
Volume
42
Issue
15
Pages
6290-6307
ISSN
  • 0306-0012
  • 1460-4744
DOI
10.1039/c2cs35231a
Cited by
1,810
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.