The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UV-curable semi-interpenetrating polymer network-integrated, highly bendable plastic crystal composite electrolytes for shape-conformable all-solid-state lithium ion batteries
Abstract
A facile approach to fabricate a highly bendable plastic crystal composite electrolyte (PCCE) for use in shape conformable all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries is demonstrated. This strategy is based on integration of a semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN) matrix with a plastic crystal electrolyte (PCE, 1 M lithium bis-trifluoromethanesulfonimide in succinonitrile). In comparison to conventional carbonate-based electrolytes, salient benefits of the PCE are the thermal stability and nonflammability, which show promising potential as a safer electrolyte. The semi-IPN matrix in the PCCE is composed of a UV (ultraviolet)-crosslinked ethoxylated trimethylolpropane triacrylate polymer network and polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene (as a linear polymer). Solid electrolyte properties of the PCCE are investigated in terms of plastic crystal behavior, mechanical bendability, and ionic transport. Owing to the presence of the anomalous semi-IPN matrix, the PCCE exhibits unprecedented improvement in bendability, along with affording high ionic conductivity. Based on this understanding of the PCCE characteristics, feasibility of applying the PCCE to solid electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries is explored. The facile ionic transport of the PCCE, in conjunction with suppressed growth of cell impedance during cycling, plays a crucial role in providing excellence in cell performance. These advantageous features of the PCCE are further discussed with an in-depth consideration of the semi-IPN matrix architecture and its specific interaction with the PCE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Runaway risk of forming toxic compounds
Hammami, A., Raymond, N., & Armand, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/424635b · Cited by 346
Cited by
Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Batteries: Advances and Prospects
Zhou, D., Shanmukaraj, D., Tkacheva, A., Armand, M., & Wang, G. (2019) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.009 · Cited by 1,539
Polymer electrolytes for lithium polymer batteries
Long, L., Wang, S., Xiao, M., & Meng, Y. (2016) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta02621d · Cited by 1,455
All solid-state polymer electrolytes for high-performance lithium ion batteries
Yue, L., Ma, J., Zhang, J., Zhao, J., Dong, S., Liu, Z., Cui, G., & Chen, L. (2016) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2016.07.003 · Cited by 1,020
Progress in nitrile-based polymer electrolytes for high performance lithium batteries
Hu, P., Chai, J., Duan, Y., Liu, Z., Cui, G., & Chen, L. (2016) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta02907h · Cited by 359
Nonflammable organic electrolytes for high-safety lithium-ion batteries
Deng, K., Zeng, Q., Wang, D., Liu, Z., Wang, G., Qiu, Z., Zhang, Y., Xiao, M., & Meng, Y. (2020) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.018 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Ha, H.-J., Kil, E.-H., Kwon, Y. H., Kim, J. Y., Lee, C. K., & Lee, S.-Y.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 6491
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2099486983
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.