The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photoelectrochemical cells for solar hydrogen production: current state of promising photoelectrodes, methods to improve their properties, and outlook
Abstract
Harnessing solar energy for the production of clean hydrogen fuels by a photoelectrochemical (PEC) cell represents a very attractive but challenging alternative. This review focuses on recent developments of some promising photoelectrode materials, such as BiVO4, a-Fe2O3, TaON, and Ta3N5 for solar hydrogen production. Some strategies have been developed to improve PEC performances of the photoelectrode materials, including: (i) doping for enhancing visible light absorption in the wide bandgap semiconductor or promoting charge transport in the narrow bandgap semiconductor, respectively; (ii) surface treatment for removing segregation phase or surface states; (iii) electrocatalysts for decreasing the overpotentials; (iv) morphology control for enhancing the light absorption and shortening transfer distance of minority carriers; (v) other methods, such as sensitization, passivating layer, and band structure engineering using heterojunction structures, and so on. Photochemical durability of the photoelectrodes is also discussed, since any potential PEC technology must balance efficiency against cost and photochemical durability. Photochemical durability may be amended by optimizing the photoelectrode, electrocatalyst, and electrolyte at the same time. In addition, solar seawater splitting is briefly introduced because it has received attention recently. Finally, trends in research in PEC cells for solar hydrogen production are detailed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Identification of Active Edge Sites for Electrochemical H 2 Evolution from MoS 2 Nanocatalysts
Jaramillo, T. F., Jørgensen, K. P., Bonde, J., Nielsen, J. H., Horch, S., & Chorkendorff, I. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141483 · Cited by 6,100
Abe, R. (2010) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.02.003 · Cited by 1,223
Cited by
Recent advances in semiconductors for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting
Hisatomi, T., Kubota, J., & Domen, K. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60378d · Cited by 4,580
Visible-light driven heterojunction photocatalysts for water splitting – a critical review
Moniz, S. J. A., Shevlin, S. A., Martin, D. J., Guo, Z.-X., & Tang, J. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03271c · Cited by 2,363
Chandrasekaran, S., Yao, L., Deng, L., Bowen, C., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Lin, Z., Peng, F., & Zhang, P. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00664d · Cited by 1,199
(2020) · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109620 · Cited by 1,160
Recent Progress in Energy‐Driven Water Splitting
Tee, S. Y., Win, K. Y., Teo, W. S., Koh, L., Liu, S., Teng, C. P., & Han, M. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600337 · Cited by 962
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Luo, W., Zhang, M., Feng, J., & Zou, Z.
- Venue
- Energy Environ. Sci.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 347-370
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W1985728643
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.