The mechanics of nanometre-scale molecular contacts
Abstract
The adhesive interactions and friction-load relationships have been investigated in liquid mixtures. For hydrogen bond-forming monolayers in acetone-heptane mixtures a linear friction-load relationship is observed at compositions that yield extensive surface solvation. As the concentration of the hydrogen bond acceptor in the liquid medium is reduced, non-linear friction-load relationships are observed that may be modelled using DMT mechanics. These observations are rationalized by assuming, as others have previously suggested, that the friction force is the sum of a load-dependent term and a shear term. The load-dependent term is found to be invariant with the adhesion force and represents energy dissipation in molecular ploughing (conformational disruption of the surface). The shear term results from adhesive interactions between the probe and the surface and correlates closely with the free energy of interaction between the hydrogen bonding functional groups. A non-linear friction-load relationship is "norm al", with linearity representing a limiting form of behaviour where unusually weak adhesion occurs (e.g. a highly solvated surface). Observations of the solvent-dependence of the pull-off force and the surface shear strength enable the prediction of thermodynamic properties of the interacting functional groups.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In air/oils, boundary layers adhere through van der Waals bonding between alkyl tails; sliding shears these bonds and occurs at midplane interface (slip plane).
“In air (and likewise in oils), as shown long ago by Hardy and extensively studied since [7, 8, 92, 93], the boundary layers adhere through van der Waals bonding at the interface between their alkyl tails. When sliding past each other, these bonds shear and sliding occurs at the midplane interface, which is then the slip plane.”
From Hydration lubrication (2013) · cites this paper as [92]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Klein, J. (2013) · Friction · doi:10.1007/s40544-013-0001-7 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
- Authors
- Busuttil, K., Nikogeorgos, N., Zhang, Z., Geoghegan, M., Hunter, C. A., & Leggett, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Leggett, Graham J.
- Venue
- Faraday Discussions
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 325
- ISSN
- 1359-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5498
- OpenAlex
- W2028946121
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Faraday Discussions (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/F039999/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Surface Chemistry and Catalysis
- Keywords
- nanoscale adhesion, surface solvation, energy dissipation, pull-off force, solvent dependence, liquid mixtures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review