The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Silver nanoparticle characterization using single particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS) and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation ICP-MS (AF4-ICP-MS)
Abstract
Methods to detect, quantify, and characterize engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in environmental matrices are highlighted as one of the areas of highest priority research needs with respect to understanding the potential environmental risks associated with nanomaterials. More specifically, techniques are needed to determine the size and concentration of ENPs in a variety of complex matrices. Furthermore, data should be collected at environmentally and toxicologically relevant concentrations. Both single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SP-ICP-MS) and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation (AF4) ICP-MS offer substantial advantages for detecting ENPs and assessing many of the above parameters in complex matrices over traditional characterization methods such as microscopy, light scattering, and filtration. In this study, we compared the ability of two emerging techniques to detect well characterized, monodisperse silver ENPs and examined their overall applicability to environmental studies specifically with respect to their: (A) size and concentration detection limits, (B) resolution and (C) multi-form elemental analysis. We find that in terms of concentration detection limit (both, on a mass basis and particle number basis) SP-ICP-MS was considerably more sensitive than AF4-ICP-MS (ng L−1vs. μg L−1, respectively), and offers the unique ability to differentiate dissolved and nanoparticulate fractions of total metal. With a variety of optimization parameters possible, AF4-ICP-MS can detect a much smaller NP size (2 nm vs. 20 nm for SP-ICP-MS), provides the possibility for greater size resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
von der Kammer, F., Ferguson, P. L., Holden, P. A., Masion, A., Rogers, K. R., Klaine, S. J., Koelmans, A. A., Horne, N., & Unrine, J. M. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.723 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Nanoparticle Size Detection Limits by Single Particle ICP-MS for 40 Elements
Lee, S., Bi, X., Reed, R. B., Ranville, J. F., Herckes, P., & Westerhoff, P. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502422v · Cited by 448
Self-citationDe la Calle, I., Menta, M., & Séby, F. (2016) · Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.sab.2016.09.007 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitrano, D. M., Barber, A., Bednar, A., Westerhoff, P., Higgins, C. P., & Ranville, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1131
- ISSN
- 0267-9477 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5544
- OpenAlex
- W2104995365
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Silver nanoparticle characterization using single particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS) and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation ICP-MS (AF4-ICP-MS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2ja30021d
- The paper
- Mitrano, D. M., Barber, A., Bednar, A., Westerhoff, P., Higgins, C. P., & Ranville, J. F. (2012). Silver nanoparticle characterization using single particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS) and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation ICP-MS (AF4-ICP-MS). Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ja30021d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.