The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eco-friendly cellulose nanofiber paper-derived separator membranes featuring tunable nanoporous network channels for lithium-ion batteries
Abstract
Eco-friendly cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), a core constituent of cellulose, have garnered increasing attention as a promising sustainable building block source for advanced materials in various application fields. In the present study, we successfully fabricate a cellulose nanofiber paper from a CNF suspension and explore its potential application to a separator membrane for lithium-ion batteries. In contrast to macro/microscopic cellulose fibers that have been commonly used for typical papers, the CNFs are characterized by the nanometer-scale diameter/length up to several micrometers and highly crystalline domains, contributing to excellent mechanical/thermal properties and nanoporous structure evolution. A salient feature of the cellulose nanofiber paper-derived separator membrane (referred to as “CNP separator”) is an electrolyte-philic, nanoscale labyrinth structure established between closely piled CNFs. The unusual porous structure is fine-tuned by varying the composition ratio of the solvent mixture (= isopropyl alcohol (IPA)–water) in the CNF suspension, wherein IPA is introduced as a CNF-disassembling agent while water promotes dense packing of CNFs. Based on a solid understanding of separator characteristics, electrochemical performances of cells assembled with the CNP separators are investigated. Notably, the CNP separator manufactured with IPA–water = 95/5 (vol/vol%) exhibits highly interconnected nanoporous network channels and satisfactory mechanical properties, which play a significant role in improving separator properties and cell performance. This study underlines that the porous structure-tuned cellulose nanofiber papers provide a promising new route for the fabrication of advanced separator membranes, which will also serve as a key component to boost the development of next-generation paper batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wood-Derived Materials for Green Electronics, Biological Devices, and Energy Applications
Zhu, H., Luo, W., Ciesielski, P. N., Fang, Z., Zhu, J. Y., Henriksson, G., Himmel, M. E., & Hu, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225 · Cited by 1,532
Building Safe Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Review
Duan, J., Tang, X., Dai, H., Yang, Y., Wu, W., Wei, X., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-019-00060-4 · Cited by 893
Porous membranes in secondary battery technologies
Lu, W., Yuan, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00823b · Cited by 479
Du, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, W., & Deng, Y. (2017) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.001 · Cited by 426
Separators for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: A Review on the Production Processes and Recent Developments
Deimede, V., & Elmasides, C. (2015) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.201402215 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Chun, S.-J., Choi, E.-S., Lee, E.-H., Kim, J. H., Lee, S.-Y., & Lee, S.-Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 16618
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2128351871
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eco-friendly cellulose nanofiber paper-derived separator membranes featuring tunable nanoporous network channels for lithium-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2jm32415f
- The paper
- Chun, S.-J., Choi, E.-S., Lee, E.-H., Kim, J. H., Lee, S.-Y., & Lee, S.-Y. (2012). Eco-friendly cellulose nanofiber paper-derived separator membranes featuring tunable nanoporous network channels for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm32415f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.