The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BiOBr–carbon nitride heterojunctions: synthesis, enhanced activity and photocatalytic mechanism
Abstract
The high recombination rate of photogenerated charges is the main problem that limits the photocatalytic activity of semiconductor photocatalysts. Herein, we have reported novel heterojunctions of BiOBr–carbon nitride (BiOBr–C3N4) fabricated by depositing BiOBr nanoflakes onto the surface of C3N4. These visible light responsive heterojunctions possess intimately contacted interfaces and well-aligned straddling band-structures, which are propitious to the effective separation and transfer of photogenerated charges, bringing an improved performance. Their photocatalytic activities were evaluated by degrading Rhodamine B in aqueous solution induced by visible or indoor light. The optimum photocatalytic activity of the 0.5BiOBr–0.5C3N4 heterojunction was almost 4.9 and 17.2 times as high as those of individual BiOBr and C3N4 under visible light irradiation, and 1.5 and 48.9 times as high under indoor light irradiation, respectively. Moreover, its activity was also much higher than those of TiO2 (P25), BiOBr–TiO2, and C3N4–TiO2 heterojunctions. On the basis of experimental and theoretical results, the photocatalytic mechanism was proposed, which revealed that organic molecules were mainly oxidized by holes concentrated in the valence band of C3N4. Our work highlights that the design of heterojunctions with well-aligned straddling band-structures by combining two visible light responsive semiconductors provides an efficient method to prepare new photocatalysts working with natural light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15172j · Cited by 2,730
Xiang, Q., Yu, J., & Jaroniec, M. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja302846n · Cited by 2,360
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Dong, G., Zhang, Y., Pan, Q., & Qiu, J. (2014) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.04.002 · Cited by 1,085
Xu, M., Han, L., & Dong, S. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am4038307 · Cited by 594
Wang, X.-J., Yang, W.-Y., Li, F.-T., Xue, Y.-B., Liu, R.-H., & Hao, Y.-J. (2013) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie402820v · Cited by 365
Zang, Y., Li, L., Li, X., Lin, R., & Li, G. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.068 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, J., Tian, Y., Chang, B., Xi, F., & Dong, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 21159
- ISSN
- 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2089226105
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BiOBr–carbon nitride heterojunctions: synthesis, enhanced activity and photocatalytic mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2jm34778d
- The paper
- Fu, J., Tian, Y., Chang, B., Xi, F., & Dong, X. (2012). BiOBr–carbon nitride heterojunctions: synthesis, enhanced activity and photocatalytic mechanism. Journal of Materials Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm34778d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.