Cited by 820Micro and Nano RoboticsBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies

Bio-inspired magnetic swimming microrobots for biomedical applications

Peyer, Kathrin E., Zhang, Li, Nelson, Bradley J.·2013·Nanoscale

Abstract

Microrobots have been proposed for future biomedical applications in which they are able to navigate in viscous fluidic environments. Nature has inspired numerous microrobotic locomotion designs, which are suitable for propulsion generation at low Reynolds numbers. This article reviews the various swimming methods with particular focus on helical propulsion inspired by E. coli bacteria. There are various magnetic actuation methods for biomimetic and non-biomimetic microrobots, such as rotating fields, oscillating fields, or field gradients. They can be categorized into force-driven or torque-driven actuation methods. Both approaches are reviewed and a previous publication has shown that torque-driven actuation scales better to the micro- and nano-scale than force-driven actuation. Finally, the implementation of swarm or multi-agent control is discussed. The use of multiple microrobots may be beneficial for in vivo as well as in vitro applications. Thus, the frequency-dependent behavior of helical microrobots is discussed and preliminary experimental results are presented showing the decoupling of an individual agent within a group of three microrobots.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2nr32554c

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In space, the computational power of computers has to remain limited because cosmic radiation burns modern CPUs.

    “In space, the computational power of computers has to remain limited because of cosmic radiation burning modern CPUs [128].”

    From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [128]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peyer, K. E., Zhang, L., & Nelson, B. J.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Bradley J.
Venue
Nanoscale
Published
2013
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
1259-1272
ISSN
  • 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-3372
OpenAlex
W2137003787
Cited by
820
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 26
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanoscale (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Centre of Competence in Research Robotics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Keywords
magnetic microrobots, bio-inspired locomotion, Escherichia coli, low Reynolds number propulsion, rotating magnetic field, alternating magnetic field, field gradient, swarm robotics, multi-agent control, frequency dependence
MeSH terms
Animals, Equipment Design, Escherichia coli, Humans, Miniaturization, Robotics, Swimming, Nanotechnology, Biomimetic Materials, Microfluidics, Magnets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review