Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View]
Open accessAbstract
Swarm robotics deals with the design, construction, and deployment of large groups of robots that coordinate and cooperatively solve a problem or perform a task. It takes inspiration from natural self-organizing systems, such as social insects, fish schools, or bird flocks, characterized by emergent collective behavior based on simple local interaction rules [1], [2]. Typically, swarm robotics extracts engineering principles from the study of those natural systems in order to provide multirobot systems with comparable abilities. This way, it aims to build systems that are more robust, fault-tolerant, and flexible than single robots and that can better adapt their behavior to changes in the environment.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This perspective reviews swarm robotics from its biological inspiration to current platforms, arguing that the field has matured but still lacks real-world deployment. It identifies open problems in hardware, design methodologies, security, and human-swarm interaction, and speculates on future application domains.
Key findings
- Swarm robotics grew from a few 1990s studies into a mature field: the phrase “swarm robotics” first appeared in Google Scholar in 1991, and usage grew considerably after 2003, with SCOPUS showing a comparable increasing trend.
- Demonstrations remain limited in scale: Swarm-bots used up to 20 robots; kilobots enabled a thousand-robot shape-formation demonstration and later hundreds-robot studies; ARGoS simulates up to 10,000 robots; research with more than 30 e-pucks remains complex and costly.
- Key lessons include that task complexity is constrained by robot capabilities, the micro-macro design problem is probably the hardest aspect, and properties such as fault tolerance and scalability are not automatically provided by a swarm.
- Future directions include hardware miniaturization, heterogeneity, decentralization versus hierarchy, phase transitions and adaptability, machine learning, security, and human-swarm interaction; potential applications include precision agriculture, infrastructure inspection, defense, civil protection, space, entertainment, and nanomedicine.
Methods
- Design: a perspective/Point of View article, not an empirical study; it synthesizes the field’s history, lessons learned, open problems, and future directions.
- Data or sample: literature and examples from swarm robotics research, plus discussions from the 2018 ONRG workshop “Swarm Robotics: Pushing the State of the Art” acknowledged in the funding section.
- Main analysis: qualitative narrative synthesis; no experimental data, systematic review protocol, or statistical analysis is reported.
Limitations
- Stated: no real-world application of swarm robotics exists, and only a few experiments have demonstrated a large number of autonomous self-organizing robots.
- Stated: the overview of future application domains is speculative because real-world applications are still to come.
- Evident: as a perspective/review, it provides no new empirical results or systematic quantitative assessment, and its claims about future impact are author opinions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
8 of 90 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Natural self-organizing systems (e.g., social insects, fish schools, bird flocks) are characterized by emergent collective behavior based on simple local interaction rules.
“It takes inspiration from natural self-organizing systems, such as social insects, fish schools, or bird flocks, characterized by emergent collective behavior based on simple local interaction rules [1], [2].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] source
- cites [2] source
Section 2.1 (Swarm Robotics; page unavailable) says swarm robotics takes inspiration from social insects and describes their self-organized collective behavior. The Introduction links local interaction rules to emergent behavior in robot swarms. Our copy does not establish the claim for fish schools or bird flocks, or explicitly describe their local interaction rules. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Collective adaptive capabilities are observed in some species of group-living animals, such as swarms of midges, schools of fish, and herds of sheep.
“Such collective capabilities are observed in some species of group-living animals (swarms of midges, schools of fish, and herds of sheep).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [90] source
- cites [91] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes coordinated behaviour in animal groups, including spontaneous evasion waves in fish schools. It does not give swarms of midges or herds of sheep as examples; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Other powerful forms of collaboration allow initially-homogeneous robots to learn different behaviors, getting specialized to tasks when this leads to group performance benefits.
“Other powerful forms of collaboration allow initially-homogeneous robots to learn different behaviors, getting specialized to tasks when this leads to group performance benefits [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
The Results section (“Collective behavior in robotics experiments”; page unavailable) describes robots programmed with a fish-behavior model and compares how interaction strategies affect group cohesion. Searches for learning, specialization, and division of labor found no passage in our copy describing robots learning different behaviors or specializing in tasks for group benefit. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In these species, interactions between individuals give rise to group properties similar to those of a physical system close to a phase transition between two macroscopic states, resulting in extreme sensitivity to changes in the behavior of a small number of individuals.
“In these species, the interactions between individuals give rise to group properties similar to those of a physical system close to a phase transition between two macroscopic states (see the glossary in Table 1), resulting in an extreme sensitivity to changes in the behavior of a small number of individuals [90], [91].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingreasoning
No real-world application of swarm robotics exists.
“and no real-world application of swarm robotics exists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
A SCOPUS search returns a comparable increasing trend.
“Similarly, a search with SCOPUS returns a comparable increasing trend (see Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Experiments have demonstrated the feasibility of the hybrid hierarchical/self-organized control approach.
“While experiments have demonstrated the feasibility of the approach [88], [89], much needs to be done to understand how the rules that allow the creation of the hierarchical control structure should be designed as a function of the task that the robot swarm has to perform, and how the passage from purely self-organized to hierarchical control and back can be activated as a function of the task and”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [89] source
- Interpretationreasoning
The types of tasks that can currently be performed by robot swarms are strongly constrained by the still limited capabilities of autonomous robots.
“First, we learned that the types of tasks that can currently be performed by robot swarms are strongly constrained by the still limited capabilities of autonomous robots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Generic robots have been used to produce proofs of concept, often addressing tasks that are a direct transposition in the artificial world of analogous tasks performed by self-organized natural systems.
“On the other hand, generic robots (alice [19], [57] and e-puck [37]) have been used to produce proofs of concept, often addressing tasks that are a direct transposition in the artificial world of analogous tasks performed by self-organized natural systems (e.g., foraging [13], [34]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The main result of the Swarm-bots project was to demonstrate what-at the present day-remains the only example of self-organized teams of robots that cooperate to solve a complex task, with the robots in the swarm taking different roles over time.
“The main result of the project was to demonstrate what-at the present day-remains the only example of self-organized teams of robots that cooperate to solve a complex task, with the robots in the swarm taking different roles over time [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] source
- Premisecitation
Downscaling hardware poses extremely hard problems that, so far, have not been solved.
“Still, downscaling hardware poses extremely hard problems that, so far, have not been solved [58].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Self-organization in homogeneous systems has been often sufficient to explain experimental observations to a great degree.
“As a matter of fact, self-organization in homogeneous systems has been often sufficient to explain experimental observations to a great degree [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
- Interpretationreasoning
Downscaling the robot size brings about new challenges that need to be addressed for swarm robotics to be able to offer practicable solutions.
“However, downscaling the robot size brings about new challenges that need to be addressed for swarm robotics to be able to offer practicable solutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The simulation-reality gap problem is particularly important in swarm robotics where it is exacerbated by the fact that many robots have to interact with each other.
“This problem is particularly important in swarm robotics where it is exacerbated by the fact that many robots have to interact with each other [44].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
- Interpretationnone given
Some properties that are given for granted in a robot swarm-e.g., fault tolerance and scalability-are not automatically provided by the swarm and require a careful design.
“The third lesson has been to understand that some of the properties that are given for granted in a robot swarm-e.g., fault tolerance and scalability-are not automatically provided by the swarm and require a careful design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Swarmanoid project demonstrated one possible direction, by studying coordinated collective behaviors in physically heterogeneous groups of robots.
“The already mentioned Swarmanoid project demonstrated one possible direction, by studying coordinated collective behaviors in physically heterogeneous groups of robots [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
- Interpretationreasoning
A divide-and-conquer approach that applies available approaches to each subtask is not sufficient to deploy usable swarm robotics systems because it overlooks the many possible interrelations between tasks and the way in which these can be further partitioned and scheduled, leading to suboptimal solutions.
“However, such a divide-andconquer approach is not sufficient to deploy usable swarm robotics systems because this overlooks the many possible interrelations between tasks and the way in which these can be further partitioned and scheduled, leading to suboptimal solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Current approaches to microrobots and nanorobots are not exploiting conventional hardware but are rather made of active colloidal particles, soft-bodied (biological) robots, bacteria-powered nanomachines, and even controllable genetically engineered organisms.
“Current approaches to microrobots and nanorobots are not exploiting conventional hardware but are rather made of active colloidal particles [77], soft-bodied (biological) robots [78], bacteria-powered nanomachines [79], [80], and even controllable genetically engineered organisms [81].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
All existing design methodologies for swarm robotics are for the moment not powerful enough: they successfully address relatively simple or constrained problems but rapidly show their limits as the problem complexity increases.
“However, all these approaches are for the moment not powerful enough: they successfully address relatively simple or constrained problems but rapidly show their limits as the problem complexity increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Mathews et al. created middleware infrastructure that allows a robot swarm to autonomously switch from purely self-organized control to hierarchical control and back.
“Mathews et al. [88] have created the infrastructuremiddleware-that allows a robot swarm to autonomously switch from purely self-organized control to hierarchical control and back.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The abovementioned properties (fault tolerance, scalability, robustness, flexibility, adaptivity) have been demonstrated using mathematical models, abstract particle systems, or multiagent systems in the context of swarms performing different behaviors.
“The abovementioned properties have been demonstrated using mathematical models, abstract particle systems, or multiagent systems in the context of swarms performing different behaviors (e.g., aggregation [70], collective motion [71], collective decision-making [20], and pattern formation [72]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Space agencies such as NASA and ESA have started to show interest in swarm technologies, with activities such as the Swarmathon competition and research on control of swarms of picosatellites.
“Accordingly, space agencies, such as NASA and ESA, have started to show interest in swarm technologies, for example, with activities such as the already mentioned Swarmathon competition [69] and with research directed at the control of swarms of picosatellites [130].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Entity authentication, data confidentiality, and data integrity issues are amplified by the presence of potentially hundreds of robots interacting with each other.
“Issues such as entity authentication, data confidentiality, and data integrity are amplified by the mere presence of potentially hundreds of robots interacting with each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent research in several disciplines has shown that a minority of committed agents can determine the overall behavior of a group.
“Recent research in several disciplines [92], [105]- [107] has shown that a minority of committed agents can determine the overall behavior of a group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [92] source
- cites [105]- [107]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Reliable identification of defects in a large infrastructure requires efficient search abilities that could be best implemented by means of swarms.
“Similarly, reliable identification of defects in a large infrastructure requires efficient search abilities that could be best implemented by means of swarms [126].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [126] source
- Interpretationcitation
Human-swarm interaction will be necessary to provide the swarm with information about goals to be achieved or tasks to be performed.
“Human-swarm interaction (HSI) will be necessary to provide the swarm with information about goals to be achieved or tasks to be performed [103], [104].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Security issues are more serious in the case of robot swarms.
“Such issues will be even more serious in the case of robot swarms [97].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] source
- Premisecitation
Collective adaptive capabilities result not only from the particular form of interactions between individuals but also from a modulation of the relative intensities of these interactions.
“Such collective adaptive capabilities do not only result from the particular form of interactions between individuals but also from a modulation of the relative intensities of these interactions [92].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
- Premisecitation
In space, the computational power of computers has to remain limited because cosmic radiation burns modern CPUs.
“In space, the computational power of computers has to remain limited because of cosmic radiation burning modern CPUs [128].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [128] source
- Interpretationcitation
Disruption in the working of the swarm might be caused by just a few malicious robots sneaking into the group.
“In addition, disruption in the working of the swarm might be caused by just a few malicious robots sneaking into the group [97].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] source
- Premisecitation
Other attempts to exploit multirobot systems for entertainment have relied on some centralized solution to finely control the system.
“In a similar way, other attempts to exploit multirobot systems for entertainment have relied on some centralized solution to finely control the system [132], [133].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
In such conditions, the reaction of a few individuals that have detected a change in the environment can spread to all other group members, allowing them to react efficiently to disturbances such as a predator attack.
“In such conditions, the reaction of a few individuals that have detected a change in the environment can spread to all the other group members, allowing them to react efficiently to such disturbances as a predator attack.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Different ways have been proposed to control or steer robot swarms directly by the user, such as through gestures or EEG signals.
“Alternatively, robot swarms could be controlled or steered directly by the user, and different ways have been proposed, such as through gestures [108], [109] or EEG signals [110].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
There are already several examples of light shows performed with drone swarms both outdoors and indoors, generally based on centralized preorchestrated trajectories for the drones.
“There are already several examples of light shows performed with drone swarms both outdoors and indoors [131], which, however, are generally based on centralized preorchestrated trajectories for the drones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [131] source
- Interpretationreasoning
Even if a problem is better solved with a multirobot system, this does not necessarily imply the need for a robot swarm.
“In other words, even if a problem is better solved with a multirobot system, this does not necessarily imply the need for a robot swarm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Early identification of disease outbreaks within a crop field requires information sharing between robots to make global patterns emerge from coupled local views, supporting suitable responses and better strategic planning.
“For instance, early identification of the outbreak of diseases within a crop field requires information sharing between robots to make global patterns emerge from coupled local views, supporting suitable responses and better strategic planning [95], [125].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
- May combine two claims. 30
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSpecific robots developed to solve specific (toy) problems have opened new research directions but not always resulted in reusable components to be borrowed in different contexts.
“On the one hand, specific robots have been developed to solve specific (toy) problems (e.g., termes [56] and kilobots [30]).These examples have opened new research directions but not always resulted in reusable components to be borrowed in different contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] source
- cites [30] source
The citing sentence uses this source as an example of kilobots, but Materials and Methods (“The task and the environment”; page unavailable) explicitly says the experiments used simulated foot-bot robots. The paper’s discussion of its robotics task does not establish the separate claim about whether components were reusable in other contexts. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe kilobot was conceived to support the first demonstration of a large robot swarm designed for shape formation and has been later used for several successful studies, allowing swarm robotics to be demonstrated in physical settings with hundreds of robots.
“Kilobots were conceived to support the first demonstration of a large robot swarm designed for shape formation [31] and have been later used for several successful studies, allowing swarm robotics to be demonstrated in physical settings with hundreds of robots [32]- [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the last two decades, swarm robotics has grown from a small domain initiated by a few studies with a clear biological inspiration to a mature research field involving several labs and researchers worldwide.
“In the last two decades, swarm robotics has grown from a small domain initiated by a few studies with a clear biological inspiration [9]- [12] to a mature research field involving several labs and researchers worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [10] source
The Introduction says engineers drew inspiration from social insects to design swarm-robotics systems, supporting the biological-inspiration part of the cited clause. It does not say that the field began with a few studies or was initially a small domain. The citation appears before the sentence’s claim about later worldwide growth, which this paper also does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMachine learning as a design methodology suffers from problems associated with the automatic design of robot swarms, additional constraints of online learning by trial and error, episodic rewards, and coordination problems.
“Machine learning as a design methodology suffers from the problems associated with the automatic design of robot swarms [44], with the additional constraints given by online learning of behaviors by trial and error [93], with episodic rewards and coordination problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [93] source
The cited paper’s discussion (p. 3) describes a model of coordination in moving animal groups and suggests it may inform the design of grouping robots. It does not address online machine learning by trial and error or episodic rewards; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. In the citing sentence, the citation to this paper is attached specifically to the online-learning constraint. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAs of today, only a few experiments have managed to demonstrate a large number of autonomous self-organizing robots.
“As a matter of fact, as of today, only a few experiments have managed to demonstrate a large number of autonomous self-organizing robots”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Swarmanoid project extended the ideas and algorithms developed in Swarm-bots to heterogeneous robot swarms composed of three types of robots-flying, climbing, and ground-based-that collaborated to carry out a search and retrieval task.
“The Swarmanoid project (2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) extended the ideas and algorithms developed in Swarm-bots to heterogeneous robot swarms composed of three types of robots-flying, climbing, and ground-based-that collaborated to carry out a search and retrieval task [28], [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe miniaturization of hardware will be a key element for experimentation in the lab with large swarms and for many future applications.
“Finally, it should be added that the miniaturization of hardware will be a key element for experimentation in the lab with large swarms and for many future applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe e-puck is probably the most used swarm robotics platform to date, but research with more than 30 e-pucks remains complex and costly.
“The e-puck [37] is probably the most used swarm robotics platform to date, but research with more than 30 e-pucks remains complex and costly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhile aquatic and underwater technologies still need substantial development efforts to become mature, drones are already commercialized and represent a very promising platform for remote sensing applications in different domains, being currently hindered only by the lack of a legal framework authorizing autonomous and group flight.
“While aquatic and underwater technologies still need substantial development efforts to become mature, drones are instead already commercialized and represent a very promising platform for remote sensing applications in different domains, being currently hindered only by the lack of a legal framework authorizing autonomous and group flight.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese data show that, even though the swarm robotics research field finds its roots in a few seminal works published in the 1990s, it is only with the year 2000 that it started to significantly grow.
“These data show that, even though the swarm robotics research field finds its roots in a few seminal works published in the 1990s, it is only with the year 2000 that it started to significantly grow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSwarm robotics is not limited to ground platforms: recent work has considered aquatic surface and underwater robots, as well as swarms of flying drones.
“Swarm robotics is not limited to ground platforms: recent work has considered aquatic surface [38] and underwater robots [39], as well as swarms of flying drones [40], [41].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAchieving swarm behavior in robots demands much more than simply applying swarm intelligence algorithms to existing robotic platforms.
“However, it has quickly become evident that achieving swarm behavior in robots demands much more than simply applying swarm intelligence algorithms to existing robotic platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe kilobot, being conceived for swarm robotics research, is widely used, but it is severely limited in its abilities, so much that virtualization environments have been proposed to increase the research possibilities.
“The kilobot, being conceived for swarm robotics research, is widely used, but it is severely limited in its abilities, so much that virtualization environments have been proposed to increase the research possibilities [59], [60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTo date, research has only scratched the surface of a domain with huge potential (miniature robots).
“To date, research has only scratched the surface of a domain with huge potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHierarchies are observed in many animal societies and often coexist with self-organization.
“The introduction of some form of hierarchical control might also be justified by the fact that hierarchies are observed in many animal societies where they often go side by side with self-organization [86], [87].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAddressing the micro-macro problem-how to design the swarm behavior (macro-level), given we can only directly program the individual robots (micro-level) that compose the swarm-is probably the most difficult aspect to be considered.
“Indeed, the second lesson that we have learned is that addressing the micro-macro problem-how to design the swarm behavior (macro-level), given we can only directly program the individual robots (micro-level) that compose the swarm-is probably the most difficult aspect to be considered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAlthough the collaboration between biologists and roboticists has been very fruitful, it has often been unidirectional, with robotics taking more than what it gave back to biology.
“It is also interesting to note that, although the collaboration between biologists and roboticists has been very fruitful, it has often been unidirectional, with robotics taking more than what it gave back to biology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe homogeneity assumption still pervades research in swarm robotics: all robots are identical and all run the same control software, they are all replaceable, and only the individual history of interactions with the (social) environment can lead to the expression of a somewhat specialized behavior.
“The homogeneity assumption still pervades research in swarm robotics: all robots are identical and all run the same control software, they are all replaceable, and only the individual history of interactions with the (social) environment can lead to the expression of a somewhat specialized behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMicrorobots and nanorobots are confronted with different physical laws than at the macroscopic scale, requiring novel models of collective behavior.
“Microrobots and nanorobots are confronted with different physical laws than at the macroscopic scale, requiring novel models of collective behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe question of decentralization versus hierarchy, or of how to integrate these two aspects, is currently understudied.
“The question of decentralization versus hierarchy, or of how to integrate these two aspects, is currently understudied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIt is unlikely that biological inspiration will be able alone to guide us when the behaviors required of the robot swarm become very application-specific.
“It is, therefore, unlikely that biological inspiration will be able alone to guide us when the behaviors required of the robot swarm become very application-specific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIntegrating conventional ways of perception and action is extremely challenging, demanding a rethink of the strategies for designing and controlling such swarms.
“Also, integrating conventional ways of perception and action is extremely challenging [82], demanding a rethink of the strategies for designing and controlling such swarms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTaming the complexity of the self-organized behavior displayed by heterogeneous entities is still very challenging but promises great advances for the domain as a whole.
“Taming the complexity of the self-organized behavior displayed by heterogeneous entities is, however, still very challenging but promises great advances for the domain as a whole.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe problem known in robotics as the simulation-reality gap is that differences between the models used in simulation and their real-world counterparts cause a drop in performance when robot controllers developed in simulation are used in the real world.
“The problem, known in robotics as the simulation-reality gap [62], is that differences between the models used in simulation and their real-world counterparts cause a drop in performance when robot controllers developed in simulation are used in the real world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCurrent practices do not address providing performance guarantees sufficiently, being limited to empirical assessments of performance statistics.
“Finally, providing performance guarantees is very much needed, but current practices do not address this point sufficiently, being limited to empirical assessments of performance statistics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHow to command and control a swarm is extremely important, in order to let users interact with the robotic system in a meaningful and effortless way.
“How to command and control a swarm is also extremely important, in order to let users interact with the robotic system in a meaningful and effortless way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSelf-organizing processes in some wasp colonies lead to the formation of a linear hierarchy and the emergence of a single reproducing individual.
“This would be similar to what occurs in some wasp colonies where self-organizing processes lead to the formation of a linear hierarchy and the emergence of a single reproducing individual [87].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe possibility of integrating autonomous robots into natural swarms offers novel research directions that are just starting to be explored.
“In addition, the possibility of integrating autonomous robots into natural swarms offers novel research directions that are just starting to be explored [18], [74]- [76].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe homogeneity assumption stems from theoretical models of collective behavior, which often simplify a complex phenomenon to gain tractability.
“This assumption stems from theoretical models of collective behavior, which often simplify a complex phenomenon to gain tractability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCentralized or hierarchical control approaches would require machinery that makes the system vulnerable to a single point of failure and difficult to scale.
“Unfortunately, these approaches would require the introduction of machinery that would make the system vulnerable (single point of failure) and difficult to scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSolutions that design the hardware to present self-organizing properties are plausible although, in this case, it may be difficult to obtain flexible and adaptive behavior.
“Solutions that design the hardware to present self-organizing properties are also plausible [83], [84] although, in this case, it may be difficult to obtain flexible and adaptive behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCrazyflies are also becoming very much used as flying platforms for swarm robotics studies even though they were not conceived for swarm robotics research.
“Crazyflies [61] are also becoming very much used as flying platforms for swarm robotics studies [41] even though they were not conceived for swarm robotics research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationARGoS allows the real-time dynamical simulation of up to 10 000 robots due to a clever modular design and the possibility to parallelize the simulation, and it includes the models of some of the most used robots in swarm robotics (e-pucks and kilobots).
“ARGoS [63] stands out for the native support to swarm robotics research.ARGoS allows the real-time dynamical simulation of up to 10 000 robots due to a clever modular design and the possibility to parallelize the simulation.Moreover, it includes the models of some of the most used robots in swarm robotics (e-pucks and kilobots).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividuals within natural swarms can be very different from each other, both physically and behaviorally, with individual personalities affecting the response to environmental and social cues.
“However, individuals within natural swarms can be very different from each other, both physically and behaviorally, with individual personalities affecting the response to environmental and social cues [85].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningTranslating theoretical findings into working robotic systems often requires a complete rethink of the approaches to introduce features and constraints not considered in the necessarily simplified theoretical models and to account for the specificity of the target application domain.
“However, translating theoretical findings into working robotic systems often requires a complete rethink of the approaches to introduce features and constraints not considered in the necessarily simplified theoretical models and to account for the specificity of the target application domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA notable first step proposes hybrid systems where hierarchical control structures resulting from self-organizing processes can appear on the fly in an ad hoc manner.
“A notable first step in this direction [88] proposes to create hybrid systems where hierarchical control structures resulting from self-organizing processes can appear on the fly in an ad hoc manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSecurity against external attacks is needed to make swarms resilient to malicious users trying to sneak into and seize the swarm.
“Security against external attacks is needed to make swarms resilient to malicious users trying to sneak into and seize the swarm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAll these features (flexibility, adaptivity, resilience) would benefit robot swarms, but heterogeneity is not exploited as much as it should.
“All these features would benefit robot swarms, but heterogeneity is not exploited as much as it should.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Heterogeneity is fundamental to grant collectives with flexibility of behavior, adaptivity to new conditions, and resilience to external perturbations.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationRobot swarms could truly help biologists, providing artificial, controllable models to study the effects of embodiment, perception, action, and the individual cognitive requirements necessary to support collective behavior.
“We believe that this situation can be improved and that robot swarms could truly help biologists, providing artificial, controllable models to study the effects of embodiment, perception, action, and the individual cognitive requirements necessary to support collective behavior [19], [73].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenProviding other properties not intrinsically granted by self-organizing robot swarms, such as robustness, flexibility, or adaptivity, is even more difficult.
“The difficulties are even larger if one wants to provide other properties not intrinsically granted by self-organizing robot swarms, such as robustness, flexibility, or adaptivity (see the glossary in Table 1 for a definition of these terms).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAchieving and controlling collective behavior in such systems will require novel paradigms, as the ability to precisely governing the individual behavior will be forcedly limited.
“Achieving and controlling collective behavior in such systems will require novel paradigms, as the ability to precisely governing the individual behavior will be forcedly limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA high level of explainability is necessary to foster acceptance and trust of swarms by users and laypeople.
“This also requires a high level of explainability, which is necessary to foster acceptance and trust of swarms by users and laypeople.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFlightmare is a (multi-)UAV simulator capable of photorealistic rendering of the environment, useful for studies of visual navigation and remote sensing.
“Another interesting example is Flightmare [64], a (multi-)UAV simulator capable of photorealistic rendering of the environment, useful for studies of visual navigation and remote sensing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBoth precision agriculture and infrastructure inspection happen in somewhat static environments.
“Both precision agriculture and infrastructure inspection happen in somewhat static environments (the crop field or the infrastructure to inspect).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenResearch in robot swarm security is still in its infancy.
“Research in robot swarm security is still in its infancy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRobots sent out in space cannot be easily repaired or substituted, which is addressed by the swarm robotics focus on redundant systems where the failure of one robot causes only a graceful degradation of swarm performance.
“Robots that are sent out in space cannot be easily repaired or substituted, which is well addressed by the swarm robotics focus on redundant systems where the failure of one of the robots does cause only a graceful degradation of the swarm performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese initial works allow addressing how to keep information in a swarm private, how to avoid disruption due to malicious robots, and how to counter Sybil attacks.
“These initial works allow to address issues such as how to keep information in a swarm private [98], [100], how to avoid disruption due to the presence of malicious robots [101], and how to counter Sybil attacks [99].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe main difficulty in human-swarm interaction is that, with the swarm being self-organized, there is no clear entity with which a human could establish communication.
“The main difficulty is given by the fact that, with the swarm being self-organized, there is no clear entity with which a human could establish communication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningApplications such as precision agriculture or infrastructure inspection and maintenance require dealing with an unstructured, unpredictable environment often covering extensive areas and can benefit from parallelization and collaboration between robots in a swarm.
“Conversely, applications such as precision agriculture or infrastructure inspection and maintenance require dealing with an unstructured, unpredictable environment-often covering extensive areas-and can benefit from parallelization and collaboration between robots in a swarm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSwarm robotics is a young discipline and there are still many open research questions.
“However, this is a very difficult question, especially so given that swarm robotics is a young discipline and that, as discussed above, there are still many open research questions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThe design of any human-swarm interaction solution will require an understanding of the psychological effects induced on humans who interact with a robot swarm in order to favor interaction modalities that reduce stress and improve usability and trust.
“The design of any HSI solution will also require an understanding of the psychological effects induced on humans who interact with a robot swarm in order to favor interaction modalities that reduce stress [111], [112] and improve usability and trust [113].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere is a lack of working methodologies to move from problem specification to robot swarm implementation and deployment.
“Given the lack of working methodologies to move from problem specification to robot swarm implementation and deployment, in the following we discuss a few general guidelines that should direct the choice of swarm robotics solutions when dealing with a concrete application problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInitial work is investigating how traditional and less traditional approaches to security can be exploited either to add security layers or to be fully integrated in the control architecture of robot swarms.
“Initial work is investigating how traditional (e.g., cryptographic Merkle trees [98]) and less traditional (blockchain [99]) approaches to security can be exploited either to add security layers or to be fully integrated in the control architecture of robots swarms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAlthough service robots are usually not organized as a swarm, the coordination of activities and allocation of tasks performed by each robot can be decentralized and self-organized to some extent.
“For instance, although service robots are usually not organized as a swarm, the coordination of activities and allocation of tasks performed by each robot can be decentralized and self-organized to some extent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningCurrent practice consists of evaluating the suitability of swarm robotics solutions on the basis of expected advantages with respect to other solutions, factoring in constraints imposed by available technologies.
“As a consequence, the current practice consists of evaluating the suitability of swarm robotics solutions on the basis of the expected advantages with respect to other solutions, factoring in the constraints imposed by available technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenDirect control of a swarm by a user is complicated because understanding what the swarm is doing might be very challenging due to the multitude of interactions, which might be hard to read for a human observer.
“Direct control of a swarm by a user is complicated by the fact that understanding what the swarm is doing might be very challenging due to the multitude of interactions happening within the swarm, which might be hard to “read” for a human observer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAs of today, the only prominent use of machine learning in swarm robotics has been the exploitation of evolutionary algorithms for developing simple neural controllers driving the behavior of individual robots in the swarm.
“As of today, the only prominent use of machine learning in swarm robotics has been the exploitation of evolutionary algorithms (see the glossary in Table 1) for the development of simple neural controllers driving the behavior of individual robots in the swarm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe great interest in swarm robotics research recorded to date is due to the expected forthcoming ubiquity of autonomous robots in real-world applications and to the challenge of letting them cooperate with each other and with their human users while avoiding the pitfalls of centralized control.
“The great interest in swarm robotics research recorded to date [114]- [116] is due to the expected forthcoming ubiquity of autonomous robots in real-world applications and to the challenge of letting them cooperate with each other and with their human users avoiding the pitfalls of centralized control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114]- [116]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInteraction with a single machine or robot is a very well-studied problem, while interaction with a robot swarm opens completely new avenues.
“While the interaction with a single machine/robot is a very well-studied problem [102], the interaction with a robot swarm opens completely new avenues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe application of robot swarms is sought by defense agencies worldwide, which find appealing a system that cannot be easily shut down.
“The application of robot swarms is sought by defense agencies worldwide, that find extremely appealing a system that cannot be easily shut down [127].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [127] source
The paper relies on this without support.
Heterogeneity is fundamental to grant collectives with flexibility of behavior, adaptivity to new conditions, and resilience to external perturbations.
“Heterogeneity is considered fundamental to grant collectives with the flexibility of behavior, adaptivity to new conditions, and resilience to external perturbations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Real-world applications of swarm robotics are still to come.
“This overview is of a speculative nature since-as we said-real-world applications are still to come.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting dates for the start of significant growth
MinorThe text says use of the phrase "swarm robotics" remained very limited until 2003, then cites those search data as showing that the field began to grow significantly in 2000. The stated start dates do not match.
“its usage remained very limited until 2003 when it started to grow considerably.”
“These data show that, even though the swarm robotics research field finds its roots in a few seminal works published in the 1990s, it is only with the year 2000 that it started to significantly grow.”
Cites
Gonzalez, T. F. (2007) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420010749-33 · Cited by 6,606 · see citing works
Bonabeau, E. W., Dorigo, M., & Guy Theraulaz, A. (1999) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195131581.001.0001 · Cited by 6,588 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Organization in Biological Systems
Sneyd, J., Theraula, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Franks, N. R. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9780691212920 · Cited by 2,949 · see citing works
Vicsek, T., & Zafeiris, A. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,923 · see citing works
Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03236 · Cited by 2,753 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey of Multiagent Reinforcement Learning
Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & De Schutter, B. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2007.913919 · Cited by 2,235 · see citing works
Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective
Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M. (2013) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-012-0075-2 · Cited by 1,791 · see citing works
Self-citationA Formal Analysis and Taxonomy of Task Allocation in Multi-Robot Systems
Gerkey, B. P., & Matarić, M. J. (2004) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364904045564 · Cited by 1,778 · see citing works
AntNet: Distributed Stigmergetic Control for Communications Networks
Di Caro, G., & Dorigo, M. (1998) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.530 · Cited by 1,579 · see citing works
Self-citationProgrammable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm
Rubenstein, M., Cornejo, A., & Nagpal, R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254295 · Cited by 1,266 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Kilobots were conceived to support the first demonstration of a large robot swarm designed for shape formation [31] and have been later used for several successful studies, allowing swarm robotics to be demonstrated in physical settings with hundreds of robots [32]–[34].”
BackgroundGrassé, P.-P. (1959) · Insectes Sociaux · doi:10.1007/bf02223791 · Cited by 1,236 · see citing works
How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters
Moussaïd, M., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016507108 · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
Self-citationThe grand challenges of <i>Science Robotics</i>
Yang, G.-Z., Bellingham, J., Dupont, P. E., Fischer, P., Floridi, L., Full, R., Jacobstein, N., Kumar, V., McNutt, M., Merrifield, R., et al. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650 · Cited by 1,177 · see citing works
Self-organization in biological systems
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-3374 · Cited by 1,124 · see citing works
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Bio-inspired magnetic swimming microrobots for biomedical applications
Peyer, K. E., Zhang, L., & Nelson, B. J. (2013) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr32554c · Cited by 820 · see citing works
The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering
Francesco Mondada, C., Michael Bonani, C., Raemy, X., Pugh, J., Cianci, C. M., Klaptocz, A., Magnenat, S., Zufferey, J., Floreano, D., & Martinoli, A. (2009) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Reconfigurable magnetic microrobot swarm: Multimode transformation, locomotion, and manipulation
Xie, H., Sun, M., Fan, X., Lin, Z., Chen, W., Wang, L., Dong, L., & He, Q. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aav8006 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Di Leonardo, R., Angelani, L., Dell’Arciprete, D., Ruocco, G., Iebba, V., Schippa, S., Conte, M. P., Mecarini, F., De Angelis, F., & Di Fabrizio, E. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0910426107 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (1999) · Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/106454699568700 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Noise and the reality gap: The use of simulation in evolutionary robotics
Jakobi, N., Husbands, P., & Harvey, I. (1995) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-59496-5_337 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
The biological principles of swarm intelligence
Garnier, S., Jacques Gautrais, A., & Guy Theraulaz, A. (2007) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-007-0004-y · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team
Werfel, J., Petersen, K., & Nagpal, R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1245842 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Optimized flocking of autonomous drones in confined environments
Vásárhelyi, G., Virágh, C., Somorjai, G., Nepusz, T., Eiben, A. E., & Vicsek, T. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aat3536 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
ARGoS: a modular, parallel, multi-engine simulator for multi-robot systems
Pinciroli, C., Trianni, V., O’Grady, R., Pini, G., Brutschy, A., Brambilla, M., Mathews, N., Ferrante, E., Di Caro, G., Ducatelle, F., et al. (2012) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-012-0072-5 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Self-citationColloquium : Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems
Muñoz, M. A. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.031001 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Social Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices
Halloy, J., Sempo, G., Caprari, G., Rivault, C., Asadpour, M., Tâche, F., Saïd, I., Durier, V., Canonge, S., Amé, J.-M., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144259 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
A scalable pipeline for designing reconfigurable organisms
Kriegman, S., Blackiston, D. J., Levin, M. G., & Bongard, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1910837117 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Fom Local Actions to Global Tasks: Stigmergy and Collective Robotics
Beckers, R., Holland, O. E., & Deneubourg, J. (2000) · Studies in cognitive systems · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0870-9_63 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Cooperative transport by ants and robots
Kube, C. R., & Bonabeau, E. (2000) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(99)00066-4 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Human Interaction With Robot Swarms: A Survey
Kolling, A., Walker, P., Chakraborty, N., Sycara, K., & Lewis, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2015.2480801 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Swarmanoid: A Novel Concept for the Study of Heterogeneous Robotic Swarms
Dorigo, M., Floreano, D., Gambardella, L. M., Francesco Mondada, C., Nolfi, S., Baaboura, T., Birattari, M., Michael Bonani, C., Brambilla, M., Brutschy, A., et al. (2013) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2013.2252996 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Self-citationMagnetically actuated microrobots as a platform for stem cell transplantation
Jeon, S., Kim, S., Ha, S., Lee, S., Kim, E., Kim, S. Y., Park, S. H., Jeon, J. H., Kim, S. W., Moon, C., et al. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Stigmergy, Self-Organization, and Sorting in Collective Robotics
Holland, O., & Melhuish, C. (1999) · Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/106454699568737 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Distributed Model Predictive Control: An Overview and Roadmap of Future Research Opportunities
(2014) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2014.2320397 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots
Krieger, M. J. B., Billeter, J.-B., & Keller, L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023164 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Evolving Self-Organizing Behaviors for a Swarm-Bot
Dorigo, M., Trianni, V., Şahi̇n, E., Groß, R., Labella, T. H., Baldassarre, G., Nolfi, S., Deneubourg, J., Francesco Mondada, C., Floreano, D., et al. (2004) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/b:auro.0000033973.24945.f3 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Self-citationElectronically integrated, mass-manufactured, microscopic robots
Miskin, M. Z., Cortese, A. J., Dorsey, K. J., Esposito, E. P., Reynolds, M. F., Liu, Q., Cao, M. C., Muller, D. A., McEuen, P. L., & Cohen, I. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2626-9 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Collective Robotics: From Social Insects to Robots
Kube, C. R., & Zhang, H. (1993) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/105971239300200204 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Trajectory Planning for Quadrotor Swarms
Honig, W., Preiss, J. A., Kumar, T. K. S., Sukhatme, G. S., & Ayanian, N. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2853613 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Flocking at a distance in active granular matter
Kumar, N., Soni, H., Ramaswamy, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5688 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Reflections on the future of swarm robotics
Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G., & Trianni, V. (2020) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abe4385 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom Local Actions to Global Tasks: Stigmergy and Collective Robotics
Beckers, R., Holland, O. E., & Deneubourg, J. L. (1994) · Artificial Life IV · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1428.003.0022 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Self-Propelled Rods: Insights and Perspectives for Active Matter
Bär, M., Großmann, R., Heidenreich, S., & Peruani, F. (2019) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050611 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Social Process and Hierarchy Formation in Small Groups: A Comparative Perspective
Chase, I. D. (1980) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094909 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Goc, M. L., Kim, L. H., Parsaei, A., Fekete, J., Dragicevic, P., & Follmer, S. (2016) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/2984511.2984547 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Minimal navigation solution for a swarm of tiny flying robots to explore an unknown environment
McGuire, K., Wagter, C. D., Tuyls, K., Kappen, H. J., & de Croon, G. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aaw9710 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Luis, C. E., Vukosavljev, M., & Schoellig, A. P. (2020) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2020.2964159 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
A taxonomy for task allocation problems with temporal and ordering constraints
Nunes, E., Manner, M., Mitiche, H., & Gini, M. (2017) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.10.008 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Crazyflie 2.0 quadrotor as a platform for research and education in robotics and control engineering
Giernacki, W., Skwierczynski, M., Witwicki, W., Wronski, P., & Kozierski, P. (2017) · 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR) · doi:10.1109/mmar.2017.8046794 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Interindividual variability in social insects – proximate causes and ultimate consequences
Jeanson, R., & Weidenmüller, A. (2013) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12074 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Interactive robots in experimental biology
Krause, J., Winfield, A. F. T., & Deneubourg, J.-L. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.015 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Kilobot: A low cost robot with scalable operations designed for collective behaviors
Rubenstein, M., Ahler, C., Hoff, N., Cabrera, A., & Nagpal, R. (2013) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.08.006 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Dorigo, M. (2007) · Scholarpedia · doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1461 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationThe cooperation of swarm-bots - Physical interactions in collective robotics
Francesco Mondada, C., Gambardella, L. M., Floreano, D., Nolfi, S., Deneubourg, J., & Dorigo, M. (2005) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2005.1458313 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationHuman-Robot Interaction: An Introduction
Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Šabanović, S. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108676649 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Slavkov, I., Carrillo-Zapata, D., Carranza, N., Diego, X., Jansson, F., Kaandorp, J. A., Hauert, S., & Sharpe, J. A. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aau9178 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Ijspeert, A. J., Martinoli, A., Billard, A., & Gambardella, L. M. (2001) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1011227210047 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Dong, X., & Sitti, M. (2020) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364920903107 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
The Best-of-n Problem in Robot Swarms: Formalization, State of the Art, and Novel Perspectives
Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., & Dorigo, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2017.00009 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationFinite-Size Scaling as a Way to Probe Near-Criticality in Natural Swarms
Attanasi, A., Cavagna, A., Del Castello, L., Giardina, I., Melillo, S., Parisi, L., Pohl, O., Rossaro, B., Shen, E., Silvestri, E., et al. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.238102 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
The emergence of consensus: a primer
Baronchelli, A. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.172189 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Teamwork in Self-Organized Robot Colonies
Shervin Nouyan, A., Groß, R., Michael Bonani, C., Francesco Mondada, C., & Dorigo, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2008.2011746 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationHonig, W., Milanes, C., Scaria, L., Phan, T., Bolas, M., & Ayanian, N. (2015) · 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2015.7354138 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Collective decision with 100 Kilobots: speed versus accuracy in binary discrimination problems
Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., Hamann, H., & Dorigo, M. (2015) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-015-9323-3 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationStrobel, V., Castelló Ferrer, E., & Dorigo, M. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems · doi:10.65109/nlel1871 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationDorigo, M., & Birattari, M. (2007) · Scholarpedia · doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1462 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-organized aggregation without computation
Gauci, M., Chen, J., Li, W., Dodd, T. J., & Groß, R. (2014) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364914525244 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Automatic Design of Robot Swarms: Achievements and Challenges
Francesca, G., & Birattari, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2016.00029 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Flightmare: A Flexible Quadrotor SimulatorPreprint
Song, Y., Naji, S., Kaufmann, E., Loquercio, A., & Scaramuzza, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5167/uzh-193792 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Persistent and Robust Execution of MAPF Schedules in Warehouses
Honig, W., Kiesel, S., Tinka, A., Durham, J. W., & Ayanian, N. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2894217 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
A Design Pattern for Decentralised Decision Making
Reina, A., Valentini, G., Fernández-Oto, C., Dorigo, M., & Trianni, V. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140950 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationA framework of space–time continuous models for algorithm design in swarm robotics
Hamann, H., & Wörn, H. (2008) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-008-0015-3 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Evolution of Collective Behaviors for a Real Swarm of Aquatic Surface Robots
Duarte, M., Costa, V., Gomes, J., Rodrigues, T., Silva, F., Oliveira, S. M., & Christensen, A. L. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151834 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Trianni, V. (2008) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77612-3 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationStrobel, V., Castelló Ferrer, E., & Dorigo, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00054 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolution of Self-Organized Task Specialization in Robot Swarms
Ferrante, E., Turgut, A. E., Duéñez-Guzmán, E., Dorigo, M., & Wenseleers, T. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004273 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationDorigo, M., & Şahi̇n, E. (2004) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/b:auro.0000034008.48988.2b · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing robots to understand social behaviour
Mitri, S., Wischmann, S., Floreano, D., & Keller, L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00236.x · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Mean-field models in swarm robotics: a survey
Elamvazhuthi, K., & Berman, S. (2019) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ab49a4 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Special issue on swarm robotics
Şahi̇n, E., & Winfield, A. F. T. (2008) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-008-0020-6 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Image and animation display with multiple mobile robots
Alonso-Mora, J., Breitenmoser, A., Rufli, M., Siegwart, R., & Beardsley, P. (2012) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364912442095 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
AutoMoDe-Chocolate: automatic design of control software for robot swarms
Francesca, G., Brambilla, M., Brutschy, A., Garattoni, L., Miletitch, R., Podevijn, G., Reina, A., Soleymani, T., Salvaro, M., Pinciroli, C., et al. (2015) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-015-0107-9 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationMobile micro-robots ready to use: Alice
Caprari, G., & Siegwart, R. (2005) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2005.1545568 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-Organized Aggregation Triggers Collective Decision Making in a Group of Cockroach-Like Robots
Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Jost, C., & Theraulaz, G. (2009) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712309103430 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationCollective response to perturbations in a data-driven fish school model
Calovi, D. S., Lopez, U., Schuhmacher, P., Chaté, H., Sire, C., & Guy Theraulaz, A. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.1362 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Human-swarm interaction using spatial gestures
Nagi, J., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M., & Di Caro, G. A. (2014) · 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6943101 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
The Embodiment of Cockroach Aggregation Behavior in a Group of Micro-robots
Garnier, S., Jost, C., Jacques Gautrais, A., Asadpour, M., Caprari, G., Jeanson, R., Grimal, A., & Guy Theraulaz, A. (2008) · Artificial Life · doi:10.1162/artl.2008.14.4.14400 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Mergeable nervous systems for robots
Mathews, N., Christensen, A. L., O’Grady, R., Francesco Mondada, C., & Dorigo, M. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00109-2 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationSurvey on Security Challenges for Swarm Robotics
Higgins, F., Tomlinson, A., & Martin, K. M. (2009) · International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1109/icas.2009.62 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Multi-robot three-dimensional coverage of unknown areas
Renzaglia, A., Doitsidis, L., Martinelli, A., & Kosmatopoulos, E. B. (2012) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364912439332 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Automatic Off-Line Design of Robot Swarms: A Manifesto
Birattari, M., Ligot, A., Bozhinoski, D., Brambilla, M., Francesca, G., Garattoni, L., Ramos, D. G., Hasselmann, K., Kegeleirs, M., Kuckling, J., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2019.00059 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
ARK: Augmented Reality for Kilobots
Reina, A., Cope, A. J., Nikolaidis, E., Marshall, J. A. R., & Sabo, C. M. (2017) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2017.2700059 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Models of Trust in Human Control of Swarms With Varied Levels of Autonomy
Nam, C., Walker, P., Li, H., Lewis, M., & Sycara, K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2019.2896845 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Roehr, T. M., Cordes, F., & Kirchner, F. (2014) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21477 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Lei, L., Escobedo, R., Sire, C., & Theraulaz, G. (2020) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007194 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationRobots mediating interactions between animals for interspecies collective behaviors
Bonnet, F., Mills, R., Szopek, M., Schönwetter-Fuchs, S., Halloy, J., Bogdan, S., Correia, L., Mondada, F., & Schmickl, T. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aau7897 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Sophisticated collective foraging with minimalist agents: a swarm robotics test
Talamali, M. S., Bose, T., Haire, M., Xu, X., Marshall, J. A. R., & Reina, A. (2020) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-019-00176-9 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Dorigo, M., de, M. A. M., & Engelbrecht, A. P. (2008) · Scholarpedia · doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1486 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationBrambilla, M., Brutschy, A., Dorigo, M., & Birattari, M. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems · doi:10.1145/2700318 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationThéraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E. W., & Deneubourg, J. (1995) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1995.0101 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Deep Neural Network-Based Cooperative Visual Tracking Through Multiple Micro Aerial Vehicles
Price, E., Lawless, G., Ludwig, R., Martinovic, I., Bulthoff, H. H., Black, M. J., & Ahmad, A. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2850224 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Rewiring neural circuits by the insertion of ectopic electrical synapses in transgenic C. elegans
Rabinowitch, I., Chatzigeorgiou, M., Zhao, B., Treinin, M., & Schafer, W. R. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5442 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Wilson, M., Melhuish, C., Sendova‐Franks, A. B., & Scholes, S. (2004) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/b:auro.0000033969.52486.3d · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Agassounon, W., Martinoli, A., & Easton, K. (2004) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/b:auro.0000033971.75494.c8 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Multirobot inspection of industrial machinery
Correll, N., & Martinoli, A. (2009) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2008.931633 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Garnier, S., Combe, M., Jost, C., & Guy Theraulaz, A. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002903 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Multi-level spatial modeling for stochastic distributed robotic systems
Prorok, A., Correll, N., & Martinoli, A. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364911399521 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Secure and secret cooperation in robot swarms
Ferrer, E. C., T, T. H. M. I., Pentland, A., & Dorigo, M. (2021) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abf1538 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationMinimalistic approach towards communication and perception in microrobotic swarms
Kornienko, S., Kornienko, O., & Levi, P. A. (2005) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2005.1545594 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Kilogrid: a novel experimental environment for the Kilobot robot
Valentini, G., Antoun, A., Trabattoni, M., Wiandt, B., Tamura, Y., Hocquard, E., Trianni, V., & Dorigo, M. (2018) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-018-0155-z · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationTsykunov, E., Agishev, R., Ibrahimov, R., Labazanova, L., Tleugazy, A., & Tsetserukou, D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2019.2927338 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Podevijn, G., O’Grady, R., Mathews, N., Gilles, A., Fantini-Hauwel, C., & Dorigo, M. (2016) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-016-0124-3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-Organizing and Scalable Shape Formation for a Swarm of Pico Satellites
Pinciroli, C., Birattari, M., Tuci, E., Dorigo, M., Zapatero, M. D. R., Vinko, T., & Izzo, D. (2008) · 2008 NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems · doi:10.1109/ahs.2008.41 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationProvable self-organizing pattern formation by a swarm of robots with limited knowledge
Coppola, M., Guo, J., Gill, E. K. A., & de Croon, G. (2019) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-019-00163-0 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Fundamental Collective Behaviors in Swarm Robotics
Trianni, V., & Campo, A. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_71 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationDrone shows: Creative potential and best practices
(2017) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-010831954 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Two invariants of human-swarm interaction
Brown, D. S., Goodrich, M. A., Jung, S.-Y., & Kerman, S. C. (2015) · Journal of Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.5898/jhri.5.1.brown · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Zahadat, P., & Schmickl, T. (2016) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712316633028 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
On the use of Bio-PEPA for modelling and analysing collective behaviours in swarm robotics
Massink, M., Brambilla, M., Latella, D., Dorigo, M., & Birattari, M. (2013) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-013-0079-6 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationAchieving Consensus in Robot Swarms
Valentini, G. (2017) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53609-5 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Scalability in Computing and Robotics
Hamann, H., & Reina, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2021.3089044 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Dynamic UAV Swarm Deployment for Non-Uniform Coverage
Albani, D., Manoni, T., Nardi, D., & Trianni, V. (2018) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems · doi:10.65109/zlsf2164 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationA checklist for safe robot swarms
Hunt, E. R., & Hauert, S. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0213-2 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Gesturing at Subswarms: Towards Direct Human Control of Robot Swarms
Podevijn, G., O’Grady, R., Nashed, Y. S. G., & Dorigo, M. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43645-5_41 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationKazadi, S., & Koch, C. (2000) · DigitalCommons-IMSA (Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy) · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Formation Control of UAVs and Mobile Robots Using Self-organized Communication Topologies
Zhu, W., Allwright, M., Heinrich, M. K., Oğuz, S., Christensen, A. L., & Dorigo, M. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60376-2_25 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationSwarmathon: A Swarm Robotics Experiment For Future Space Exploration
Nguyen, L. A., Harman, T. L., & Fairchild, C. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Measurement and Control in Robotics (ISMCR) · doi:10.1109/ismcr47492.2019.8955661 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Finding Consensus Without Computation
Ozdemir, A., Gauci, M., Bonnet, S., & Gros, R. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2795640 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Garattoni, L., & Birattari, M. (2016) · Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering · doi:10.1002/047134608x.w8312 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Mondada, L., Karim, M. E., & Mondada, F. (2016) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-016-0127-0 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
How individual interactions control aggregation patterns in gregarious arthropods
Gautrais, J., Jost, C., Jeanson, R., & Theraulaz, G. (2004) · Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.5.2.05gau · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Robotic Canvas: Interactive Painting onto Robot Swarms
Alhafnawi, M., Hauert, S., & O’Dowd, P. (2020) · Conference on Artificial Life (ALIFE) · doi:10.1162/isal_a_00285 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Dawkins, J. J., Crabbe, F. L., & Evangelista, D. (2018) · International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) · doi:10.1109/icuas.2018.8453456 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Towards Differentially Private Aggregation of Heterogeneous Robots
Prorok, A., & Kumar, V. (2018) · Springer proceedings in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73008-0_41 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Podevijn, G., O’Grady, R., Fantini-Hauwel, C., & Dorigo, M. (2018) · Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73008-0_37 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationData from: Optimized flocking of autonomous drones in confined environments
Vásárhelyi, G., Virágh, C., Somorjai, G., Nepusz, T., Eiben, A. E., & Vicsek, T. (2018) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.5061/dryad.mq85r61 · Cited by 4
Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., O'Grady, R., et al. (2011) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationRobots playing soccer? RoboCup poses a new set of challenges in intelligent distributed computing
Hedberg, S. R. (1997) · IEEE Concurrency · doi:10.1109/4434.641621 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Generating Swarm Solution Classes using the Hamiltonian Method of Swarm Design
Li, M., Qiu, C., Park, J., et al. (2017) · International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART) · doi:10.5220/0006122201450152 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Secure and secret cooperation in robotic swarms
Ferrer, E. C., Hardjono, T., Pentland, A., et al. (2021) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Secure and secret cooperation in robotic swarms
Ferrer, E. C., Hardjono, T., Pentland, A. '., & Dorigo, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09266
Self-citationScalability in Computing and Robotics
Hamann, H., & Reina, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04969
Robots playing soccer? RoboCup poses a new set of AI research challenges
Hedberg, S. (1997) · IEEE Expert · doi:10.1109/64.621220
Lei, L., Escobedo, R., Sire, C., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/677005
Dorigo, M., & Socha, K. (2007) · Chapman & Hall/CRC Computer & Information Science Series · doi:10.1201/9781420010749.ch26
Self-citationFabrication of Electronically integrated, mass-manufactured, microscopic robots
Miskin, M. Z., Cortese, A. J., Dorsey, K., Esposito, E. P., Reynolds, M. F., Liu, Q., Cao, M., Muller, D. A., McEuen, P. L., & Cohen, I. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.pex-1012/v1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- sitti, 2017, Mobile Microrobotics
- messenger, 2020, Radiation hardening, AccessScience
- magistri, 2019, Using prior information to improve crop/weed classification by MAV swarms, Proc 11th Int Micro Air Vehicle Competition Conf, 67
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Triguero, I., Molina, D., Poyatos, J., Del Ser, J., & Herrera, F. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102135 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Automatic design of stigmergy-based behaviours for robot swarms
Salman, M., Garzón Ramos, D., & Birattari, M. (2024) · Communications Engineering · doi:10.1038/s44172-024-00175-7 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Automatic design can ease the realisation of robot swarms across different missions, whileminimisinghumanintervention 36,41,42,57 .”
BackgroundAutoMoDe-Mate: Automatic off-line design of spatially-organizing behaviors for robot swarms
Mendiburu, F. J., Garzón Ramos, D., Morais, M. R. A., Lima, A. M. N., & Birattari, M. (2022) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2022.101118 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Abdel-Nasser, M., El-Ferik, S., Rashad, R., & Saif, A.-W. A. (2025) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics14120192 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
LLM2Swarm: Robot Swarms that Responsively Reason, Plan, and Collaborate through LLMs
Strobel, V., Dorigo, M., & Fritz, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11387 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“These features could make robot swarms ideal for applications where fast reactions to unforeseen events are required, such as environmental monitoring and disaster response [12; 43].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G., & Trianni, V.
- Affiliations
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- National Research Council (IT)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1152-1165
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W3176202740
- Semantic Scholar
- 248b15c7f9bfd37d25db115efe75ed556120eca6
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 147
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 23.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles
- Office of Naval Research Global
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Keywords
- swarm robotics, multi-robot systems, collective behavior, emergent behavior, bio-inspired robotics, self-organization, fault tolerance, robustness, local interaction rules, social insects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review