The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemical reduction induced self-doping of Ti3+ for efficient water splitting performance on TiO2 based photoelectrodes
Abstract
Hetero-element doping (e.g., N, F, C) of TiO2 is inevitably accompanied by significantly increased structural defects due to the dopants' nature being foreign impurities. Very recently, in situ self-doping with homo-species (e.g., Ti(3+)) has been emerging as a rational solution to enhance TiO2 photoactivity within both UV and visible light regions. Herein we demonstrate that conventional electrochemical reduction is indeed a facile and effective strategy to induce in situ self-doping of Ti(3+) into TiO2 and the self-doped TiO2 photoelectrodes showed remarkably improved and very stable water splitting performance. In this study, hierarchical TiO2 nanotube arrays (TiO2 NTs) were chosen as TiO2 substrates and then electrochemically reduced under varying conditions to produce Ti(3+) self-doped TiO2 NTs (ECR-TiO2 NTs). The optimized saturation photocurrent density and photoconversion efficiency on the ECR-TiO2 NTs under simulated AM 1.5G illumination were identified to be 2.8 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V vs. RHE and 1.27% respectively, which are the highest values ever reported for TiO2 based photoelectrodes. The electrochemical impedance spectra measurement confirms that the electrochemical induced Ti(3+) self-doping improved the electrical conductivity of the ECR-TiO2 NTs. The versatility and effectiveness of the electrochemical reduction method for Ti(3+) self-doping in P25 based TiO2 was also examined and confirmed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Surface Science Studies of the Photoactivation of TiO 2 New Photochemical Processes
Thompson, T. L., & Yates, J. T. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050172k · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Oxygen defective metal oxides for energy conversion and storage
Wang, G., Yang, Y., Han, D., & Li, Y. (2017) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2017.02.009 · Cited by 353
Zhou, X., Liu, N., & Schmuki, P. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b03709 · Cited by 287
Li, B., Zhao, Z., Zhou, Q., Meng, B., Meng, X., & Qiu, J. (2014) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201402664 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Hedhili, M. N., Zhu, H., & Wang, P.
- Venue
- Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 15637
- ISSN
- 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-9084
- OpenAlex
- W2059287144
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical reduction induced self-doping of Ti3+ for efficient water splitting performance on TiO2 based photoelectrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cp52759j
- The paper
- Zhang, Z., Hedhili, M. N., Zhu, H., & Wang, P. (2013). Electrochemical reduction induced self-doping of Ti3+ for efficient water splitting performance on TiO2 based photoelectrodes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp52759j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.