The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doped quantum dots for chemo/biosensing and bioimaging
Abstract
Quantum dots (QDs) have received great interest for diverse applications due to their distinct advantages, such as narrow and symmetric emission with tunable colors, broad and strong absorption, reasonable stability, and solution processibility. Doped QDs not only potentially retain almost all of the above advantages, but also avoid the self-quenching problem due to their substantial ensemble Stokes shift. Two obvious advantages of doped QDs, especially doped ZnS QDs, over typical CdSe@ZnS and CdTe QDs are longer dopant emission lifetime and potentially lower cytotoxicity. The lifetime of dopant emission from transition-metal ion or lanthanide ion-doped QDs is generally longer than that of the bandgap or defect-related emission of host, and that of biological background fluorescence, providing great opportunities to eliminate background fluorescence for biosensing and bioimaging. For bioimaging applications, fluorescent dopants may mitigate toxicity problems by producing visible or infrared emission in nanocrystals made from less-harmful elements than those currently used. In this review, recent advances in utilizing doped QDs for chemo/biosensing and bioimaging are discussed, and the synthetic routes and optical properties of doped QDs that make them excellent probes for various strategies in chemo/biosensing and bioimaging are highlighted. Moreover, perspectives on future exploration of doped QDs for chemo/biosensing and bioimaging are also given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges
Louie, A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003538 · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
Maxwell, T., Nogueira Campos, M. G., Smith, S., Doomra, M., Thwin, Z., & Santra, S. (2020) · Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816662-8.00015-1 · Cited by 43
Doping nanoparticles using pulsed laser ablation in a liquid containing the doping agent
Chemin, A., Lam, J., Laurens, G., Trichard, F., Motto-Ros, V., Ledoux, G., Jarý, V., Laguta, V., Nikl, M., Dujardin, C., et al. (2019) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/c9na00223e · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, P., & Yan, X.-P.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5489
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W1986346490
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.