CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 605

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Immobilization of enzymes on porous silicas – benefits and challenges

Hartmann, Martin, Kostrov, Xenia·2013·Chemical Society Reviews
DOI 10.1039/c3cs60021a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Porous silica materials have extensively been used for the immobilization of enzymes aiming at their use as biocatalysts or biosensors. This tutorial review will discuss the benefits and challenges of different immobilization techniques and will provide references to recent papers for further reading. Moreover, novel trends and unsolved problems will be introduced.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3cs60021a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The favouring of adsorption on inorganic matrices is possibly due to extensive research available on those materials and their wide industrial presence, allowing easier industrial implementation of the immobilized biocatalyst.

    “This is possibly due to the extensive research available on those materials 174, 200 and their wide industrial presence 201 , thus allowing easier industrial implementation of the immobilized biocatalyst.”

    From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [200]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Hartmann, 2010, J. Mater. Chem., 20, 844, 10.1039/B907869J · DOI
  2. Khan, 2010, Curr. Res. J. Biol. Sci., 5, 565, 10.3923/rjbsci.2010.565.575 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hanefeld, 2008, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 453, 10.1039/B711564B · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kannan, 2011, J. Porous Mater., 18, 409, 10.1007/s10934-010-9392-2 · DOI
  5. Sheldon, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 1289, 10.1002/adsc.200700082 · DOI
  6. Nelson, 1916, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 38, 1109, 10.1021/ja02262a018 · DOI
  7. Diaz, 1996, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2, 115, 10.1016/S1381-1177(96)00017-3 · DOI
  8. Zhou, 2012, Top. Catal., 55, 1081, 10.1007/s11244-012-9905-0 · DOI
  9. Hartmann, 2005, Chem. Mater., 17, 4577, 10.1021/cm0485658 · DOI
  10. Yiu, 2005, J. Mater. Chem., 15, 3690, 10.1039/b506090g · DOI
  11. Hudson, 2008, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 47, 8582, 10.1002/anie.200705238 · DOI
  12. Hoffmann, 2006, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 45, 3216, 10.1002/anie.200503075 · DOI
  13. Yang, 2009, J. Mater. Chem., 19, 1945, 10.1039/b815012e · DOI
  14. Yanagisawa, 1990, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 63, 1535, 10.1246/bcsj.63.1535 · DOI
  15. Inagaki, 1993, Chem. Commun., 680, 10.1039/c39930000680 · DOI
  16. Kresge, 1992, Nature, 359, 710, 10.1038/359710a0 · DOI
  17. Huo, 1994, Chem. Mater., 6, 1176, 10.1021/cm00044a016 · DOI
  18. Zhao, 1998, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 6024, 10.1021/ja974025i · DOI
  19. Zhao, 1998, Science, 279, 548, 10.1126/science.279.5350.548 · DOI
  20. Schmidt-Winkel, 1999, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 254, 10.1021/ja983218i · DOI
  21. Chouyyok, 2009, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 56, 246, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2008.05.009 · DOI
  22. Pandya, 2005, Mesoporous Mater., 77, 67, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.08.018 · DOI
  23. Inayat, 2013, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 3753, 10.1039/C2CS35304K · DOI
  24. Weetall, 1993, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 41, 157, 10.1007/BF02916421 · DOI
  25. Enke, 2003, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 60, 19, 10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00329-9 · DOI
  26. Coniglio, 2009, Planta Med., 75, 1459, 10.1055/s-0029-1185703 · DOI
  27. Kahraman, 2007, Food Chem., 1041, 1385, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.054 · DOI
  28. Karakus, 2012, Artif. Cells, Blood Substitutes, Biotechnol., 40, 132, 10.3109/10731199.2011.611471 · DOI
  29. Vinu, 2004, Chem. Mater., 16, 3056, 10.1021/cm049718u · DOI
  30. Katiyar, 2005, J. Chromatogr., A, 1069, 119, 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.077 · DOI
  31. He, 2006, J. Mater. Chem., 16, 4307, 10.1039/b606481g · DOI
  32. Wang, 2005, Chem. Mater., 17, 953, 10.1021/cm0483137 · DOI
  33. Xu, 2011, Solid State Sci., 13, 867, 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2011.03.003 · DOI
  34. Mateo, 2004, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 86, 273, 10.1002/bit.20033 · DOI
  35. Jung, 2010, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11, 762, 10.3390/ijms11020762 · DOI
  36. Petkova, 2012, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1824, 792, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.03.010 · DOI
  37. Häring, 1999, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 3, 35, 10.1016/S1367-5931(99)80007-6 · DOI
  38. Yuan, 2001, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 43, 227, 10.1016/S1387-1811(01)00188-3 · DOI
  39. Kim, 2007, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 96, 210, 10.1002/bit.21107 · DOI
  40. Kim, 2008, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 111, 18, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.07.009 · DOI
  41. Jung, 2009, ChemSusChem, 2, 161, 10.1002/cssc.200800245 · DOI
  42. Hisamatsu, 2012, J. Porous Mater., 19, 95, 10.1007/s10934-011-9452-2 · DOI
  43. Lei, 2004, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 73, 121, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.05.004 · DOI
  44. Zhou, 2009, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 119, 223, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.013 · DOI
  45. Gustafsson, 2012, Colloids Surf., B, 100, 22, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.042 · DOI
  46. Vinu, 2004, J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 7323, 10.1021/jp037303a · DOI
  47. Secundo, 2011, J. Mater. Chem., 21, 15619, 10.1039/c1jm11475a · DOI
  48. Sörensen, 2010, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 343, 359, 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.11.014 · DOI
  49. Piras, 2011, Chem. Commun., 47, 7338, 10.1039/c1cc11840d · DOI
  50. Mayoral, 2013, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 90, 23, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2013.01.012 · DOI
  51. Zhou, 2011, Adv. Mater., 23, 2627, 10.1002/adma.201004054 · DOI
  52. Zheng, 2011, J. Biotechnol., 154, 274, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.04.013 · DOI
  53. Bian, 2012, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 32, 364, 10.1016/j.msec.2011.11.006 · DOI
  54. Gaffney, 2010, Chem. Commun., 46, 1124, 10.1039/B915169A · DOI
  55. Jung, 2008, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 113, 523, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.009 · DOI
  56. Bolivar, 2012, Langmuir, 28, 10040, 10.1021/la3012348 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hartmann, M., & Kostrov, X.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2013
Volume
42
Issue
15
Pages
6277
ISSN
  • 0306-0012
  • 1460-4744
DOI
10.1039/c3cs60021a
Cited by
605
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review