CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,675

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how

Sheldon, Roger A., van Pelt, Sander·2013·Chem. Soc. Rev.
DOI 10.1039/c3cs60075k
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3cs60075k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Roger A. Sheldon
Roger A. SheldonCC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Sander van Pelt
Sander van PeltCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Covalent binding of an enzyme to a functionalised support.
Fig. 2 Covalent binding of an enzyme to a functionalised support.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Tanabe aminoacylase process using a packed bed of biocatalyst.
Fig. 3 Tanabe aminoacylase process using a packed bed of biocatalyst.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Transesterification over protein-coated microcrystals of subtilisin Carlsberg.
Fig. 4 Transesterification over protein-coated microcrystals of subtilisin Carlsberg.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Polymer-enzyme conjugates as thermoresponsive biocatalysts.
Fig. 5 Polymer-enzyme conjugates as thermoresponsive biocatalysts.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 6 Cephalexin synthesis with a thermoresponsive polymer-penicillin G amidase conjugate.
Fig. 6 Cephalexin synthesis with a thermoresponsive polymer-penicillin G amidase conjugate.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 7 Immobilisation of ( R )-hydroxynitrile lyase as a CLEA in a lentikat.
Fig. 7 Immobilisation of ( R )-hydroxynitrile lyase as a CLEA in a lentikat.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 8 Formation of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs).
Fig. 8 Formation of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 9 Ampicillin synthesis using penicillin G amidase-CLEA.
Fig. 9 Ampicillin synthesis using penicillin G amidase-CLEA.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 11 Alcalase-CLEA catalysed peptide synthesis.
Fig. 11 Alcalase-CLEA catalysed peptide synthesis.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 13 Conversion of benzaldehyde to ( S )-mandelic acid with a combi-CLEA.
Fig. 13 Conversion of benzaldehyde to ( S )-mandelic acid with a combi-CLEA.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. J. Tao and R. J.Kazlaukas, Biocatalysis for Green Chemistry and Chemical Process Development, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2011 · DOI
  2. Wohlgemuth, 2010, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 21, 713, 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.016 · DOI
  3. Munoz Solano, 2012, Bioresour. Technol., 115, 196, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.131 · DOI
  4. Clouthierz, 2012, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 1585, 10.1039/c2cs15286j · DOI
  5. Bornscheuer, 2012, Nature, 485, 185, 10.1038/nature11117 · DOI
  6. Illanes, 2012, Bioresour. Technol., 115, 48, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.050 · DOI
  7. Sheldon, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 1289, 10.1002/adsc.200700082 · DOI
  8. Tran, 2011, ACS Catal., 1, 956, 10.1021/cs200124a · DOI
  9. Garcia-Galan, 2011, Adv. Synth. Catal., 353, 2885, 10.1002/adsc.201100534 · DOI
  10. Hanefeld, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 453, 10.1039/B711564B · DOI · Paper page
  11. L. Cao , Carrier-bound Immobilized Enzymes, Principles, Applications and Design, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005 · DOI
  12. Roy, 2004, Chem. Rev., 104, 3705, 10.1021/cr0204707 · DOI
  13. Sheldon, 2011, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 92, 467, 10.1007/s00253-011-3554-2 · DOI
  14. Sheldon, 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 213, 10.1021/op100289f · DOI
  15. Janssen, 2002, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 78, 425, 10.1002/bit.10208 · DOI
  16. Kirk, 2002, Org. Process Res. Dev., 6, 446, 10.1021/op0200165 · DOI
  17. Katchalski-Katzir, 2000, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 10, 157, 10.1016/S1381-1177(00)00124-7 · DOI
  18. Kallenberg, 2005, Adv. Synth. Catal., 347, 905, 10.1002/adsc.200505042 · DOI
  19. Petkar, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 39, 83, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.01.034 · DOI
  20. Wiemann, 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 617, 10.1021/op9000059 · DOI
  21. Krajewska, 2004, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 35, 126, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.12.013 · DOI
  22. Tosa, 1966, Enzymologia, 31, 214
  23. Petri, 2005, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 32, 219, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2004.12.001 · DOI
  24. Diaz, 1996, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2, 115, 10.1016/S1381-1177(96)00017-3 · DOI
  25. Zhou, 2012, Top. Catal., 55, 1081, 10.1007/s11244-012-9905-0 · DOI
  26. Wang, 2001, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 74, 249, 10.1002/bit.1114 · DOI
  27. Kim, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 39, 62, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.01.028 · DOI
  28. Kreiner, 2005, Biotechnol. Lett., 27, 1571, 10.1007/s10529-005-1800-3 · DOI
  29. Kreiner, 2001, Chem. Commun., 1096, 10.1039/b100722j · DOI
  30. Smart Polymers for Bioseparation and Bioprocessing, ed. I. Y. Galaev and B. Mattiasson, Taylor and Francis, London, 2004
  31. Ivanov, 2003, Biotechnol. Prog., 19, 1167, 10.1021/bp0201455 · DOI
  32. Yiu, 2012, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 87, 583, 10.1002/jctb.3735 · DOI
  33. Reetz, 1995, Angew. Chem., 107, 373, 10.1002/ange.19951070325 · DOI
  34. Reetz, 2003, Adv. Synth. Catal., 345, 717, 10.1002/adsc.200303016 · DOI
  35. Pierre, 2004, Biocatal. Biotransform., 22, 145, 10.1080/10242420412331283314 · DOI
  36. Reetz, 1996, Chem. Commun., 1397, 10.1039/CC9960001397 · DOI
  37. Orçaire, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 42, 106, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.08.002 · DOI
  38. Lozinski, 1998, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 23, 227, 10.1016/S0141-0229(98)00036-2 · DOI
  39. Jekel, 1998, Chem. Eng. Technol., 21, 275, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4125(199803)21:3<275::AID-CEAT275>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
  40. Gröger, 2001, Org. Lett., 3, 1969, 10.1021/ol015920g · DOI
  41. Margolin, 2001, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 40, 2204, 10.1002/1521-3773(20010618)40:12<2204::AID-ANIE2204>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  42. Brady, 2009, Biotechnol. Lett., 31, 1639, 10.1007/s10529-009-0076-4 · DOI
  43. Cao, 2000, Org. Lett., 2, 1361, 10.1021/ol005593x · DOI
  44. Mateo, 2004, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 86, 273, 10.1002/bit.20033 · DOI
  45. Honda, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 2163, 10.1002/adsc.200606224 · DOI
  46. Lopez-Gallego, 2005, Biomacromolecules, 6, 1839, 10.1021/bm050088e · DOI
  47. Shah, 2006, Anal. Biochem., 351, 207, 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.028 · DOI
  48. Fernandez-Lafuente, 2009, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 45, 405, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.08.009 · DOI
  49. Nuijens, 2009, J. Org. Chem., 74, 5145, 10.1021/jo900634g · DOI
  50. Nuijens, 2010, Adv. Synth. Catal., 352, 2399, 10.1002/adsc.201000313 · DOI
  51. Ferraboschi, 2010, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 21, 2136, 10.1016/j.tetasy.2010.06.040 · DOI
  52. Lopez-Serrano, 2002, Biotechnol. Lett., 24, 1379, 10.1023/A:1019863314646 · DOI
  53. Diaz-Rodriguez, 2012, Adv. Synth. Catal., 354, 3405, 10.1002/adsc.201200892 · DOI
  54. van Pelt, 2008, Chim. Oggi, 26, 2
  55. van Langen, 2005, Org. Lett., 7, 327, 10.1021/ol047647z · DOI
  56. Roberge, 2007, Tetrahedron Lett., 48, 1473, 10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.12.053 · DOI
  57. Mateo, 2006, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 17, 320, 10.1016/j.tetasy.2006.01.020 · DOI
  58. Miyazaki, 2006, Trends Biotechnol., 24, 463, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.08.002 · DOI
  59. Hickey, 2007, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 35, 1621, 10.1042/BST0351621 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,675

Metadata

Authors
Sheldon, R. A., & van Pelt, S.
Venue
Chem. Soc. Rev.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2013-03-27
Volume
42
Issue
15
Pages
6223-6235
ISSN
  • 0306-0012
  • 1460-4744
DOI
10.1039/c3cs60075k
Cited by
2,675
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cs60075k
The paper
Sheldon, R. A., & van Pelt, S. (2013). Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis: why, what and how. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60075k