Characterization of supramolecular gels
Abstract
Supramolecular gels are a fascinating class of soft materials. Their gelators can self-assemble into nano- or micro-scale superstructures, such as fibers, ribbons, sheets and spheres in an appropriate solvent, thereby resulting in the formation of 3D networks. The dynamic and reversible nature of the non-covalent interactions that contribute to the formation of these network structures together gives these supramolecular gels the inherent ability to respond to external stimuli. However, the dynamic nature of supramolecular gels, which endows them with unique properties, makes their characterization diversified at the same time. Therefore, we present here a review summarizing various methods for characterizing supramolecular gels, including nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, computational techniques, X-ray techniques, microscopy techniques, dynamic light scattering, thermal analysis, and rheology. Based on the gelation mechanisms and influencing factors of supramolecular gels, suitable and sufficient characterization methods should be carefully employed to make full use of their respective advantages to better investigate these materials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several noncovalent interactions are responsible for the formation of supramolecular architectures in the gel state, and the mechanisms have also been elucidated clearly.
“Several noncovalent interactions are responsible for the formation of supramolecular architectures in the gel state, and the mechanisms have also been elucidated clearly.53”
From A Versatile Strategy for Tailoring Noble Metal Supramolecular Gels/Aerogels and Their Application in Hydrogen Evolution (2019) · cites this paper as [53]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials and emerging anticancer therapeutics: engineering the microenvironment
Gu, L., & Mooney, D. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2015.3 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Zheng, Y., Li, N., Mukherjee, S., Yang, Y., Yan, J., Liu, J., & Fang, Y. (2019) · ACS Applied Nano Materials · doi:10.1021/acsanm.9b00401 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yu, G., Yan, X., Han, C., & Huang, F.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Feihe
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6697
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2080472241
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Society Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
- Keywords
- supramolecular gels, gelation mechanism, non-covalent interactions, stimuli-responsive materials, soft materials, self-assembly, three-dimensional network, characterization techniques, rheology, dynamic light scattering, X-ray techniques, NMR spectroscopy, thermal analysis, microscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review