The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rolling circle amplification: a versatile tool for chemical biology, materials science and medicine
Abstract
Rolling circle amplification (RCA) is an isothermal enzymatic process where a short DNA or RNA primer is amplified to form a long single stranded DNA or RNA using a circular DNA template and special DNA or RNA polymerases. The RCA product is a concatemer containing tens to hundreds of tandem repeats that are complementary to the circular template. The power, simplicity, and versatility of the DNA amplification technique have made it an attractive tool for biomedical research and nanobiotechnology. Traditionally, RCA has been used to develop sensitive diagnostic methods for a variety of targets including nucleic acids (DNA, RNA), small molecules, proteins, and cells. RCA has also attracted significant attention in the field of nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology. The RCA-produced long, single-stranded DNA with repeating units has been used as template for the periodic assembly of nanospecies. Moreover, since RCA products can be tailor-designed by manipulating the circular template, RCA has been employed to generate complex DNA nanostructures such as DNA origami, nanotubes, nanoribbons and DNA based metamaterials. These functional RCA based nanotechnologies have been utilized for biodetection, drug delivery, designing bioelectronic circuits and bioseparation. In this review, we introduce the fundamental engineering principles used to design RCA nanotechnologies, discuss recently developed RCA-based diagnostics and bioanalytical tools, and summarize the use of RCA to construct multivalent molecular scaffolds and nanostructures for applications in biology, diagnostics and therapeutics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation
Söderberg, O., Gullberg, M., Jarvius, M., Ridderstråle, K., Leuchowius, K.-J., Jarvius, J., Wester, K., Hydbring, P., Bahram, F., Larsson, L.-G., et al. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth947 · Cited by 2,419
Cited by
Self‐assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR–Cas9 for genome editing
Sun, W., Ji, W., Hall, J. M., Hu, Q., Wang, C., Beisel, C. L., & Gu, Z. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201506030 · Cited by 629
Cocoon-Like Self-Degradable DNA Nanoclew for Anticancer Drug Delivery
Sun, W., Jiang, T., Lu, Y., Reiff, M., Mo, R., & Gu, Z. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5088024 · Cited by 329
Su, H., Xu, J., Wang, Q., Wang, F., & Zhou, X. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13310-2 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Ali, M. M., Li, F., Zhang, Z., Zhang, K., Kang, D.-K., Ankrum, J. A., Le, X. C., & Zhao, W.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3324
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2027001273
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rolling circle amplification: a versatile tool for chemical biology, materials science and medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cs60439j
- The paper
- Ali, M. M., Li, F., Zhang, Z., Zhang, K., Kang, D.-K., Ankrum, J. A., Le, X. C., & Zhao, W. (2014). Rolling circle amplification: a versatile tool for chemical biology, materials science and medicine. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60439j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.