The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New and revisited insights into the promotion of methanol synthesis catalysts by CO2
Abstract
CO hydrogenation, CO2 hydrogenation, and water–gas shift (WGS) reactions have been simultaneously investigated over industry-like catalysts based on Cu–ZnO–Al2O3, under methanol synthesis conditions (513 K, 5.0 MPa). For this, a novel methodology has been applied: the concentration of carbon dioxide in the syngas feed was consecutively increased (R = CO2:(CO + CO2) = 0–100) resulting in a volcano-type plot of the rate of methanol formation and forming a hysteresis loop when decreasing the CO2 concentration again. H2O co-feeding experiments revealed that the enhancement of activity can be correlated with the WGS activity linking both hydrogenation paths of CO and CO2. On the other hand, excessive amounts of surface hydroxyls seem to inhibit methanol production, explaining the drop in activity at high CO2 concentrations. An investigation of the catalytic performance was accompanied by an extensive characterisation of the fresh and used catalytic materials by X-ray diffraction, temperature-programmed reduction by H2, N2O pulse chemisorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Auger electron spectroscopy. It was shown that the copper surface area affects the CO2 hydrogenation; however, this parameter is unambiguously not the key descriptor for CO2-promoted methanol synthesis, which is a consequence of the synergistic interaction of zinc oxide and copper. This structural feature is further promoted by Al2O3 through stabilisation of the surface. The position of the activity maximum is determined by the surface ratio Cu : Zn. The hysteresis behaviour is a result of the continuous decrease of Cu dispersion and the fixation of copper species in its monovalent oxidation state, both detrimental for CO2 hydrogenation. CO hydrogenation is strongly affected by the Cu : Zn bulk ratio and thus the reducibility of the catalyst. These facts could be substantiated by the use of impregnated model catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atom-Resolved Imaging of Dynamic Shape Changes in Supported Copper Nanocrystals
Hansen, P. L., Wagner, J. B., Helveg, S., Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R., Clausen, B. S., & Topsøe, H. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069325 · Cited by 1,261
Cited by
Lunkenbein, T., Schumann, J., Behrens, M., Schlögl, R., & Willinger, M. G. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201411581 · Cited by 608
Sampson, M. D., Nguyen, A. D., Grice, K. A., Moore, C. E., Rheingold, A. L., & Kubiak, C. P. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja501252f · Cited by 466
Grim, R. G., Huang, Z., Guarnieri, M. T., Ferrell, J. R., Tao, L., & Schaidle, J. A. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee02410g · Cited by 454
Hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol and CO on Cu/ZnO/Al2O3: Is there a common intermediate or not?
Kunkes, E. L., Studt, F., Abild-Pedersen, F., Schlögl, R., & Behrens, M. (2015) · Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.016 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, O., & Pérez-Ramírez, J.
- Venue
- Catalysis Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3343
- ISSN
- 2044-4753 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-4761
- OpenAlex
- W1974659361
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New and revisited insights into the promotion of methanol synthesis catalysts by CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cy00573a
- The paper
- Martin, O., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2013). New and revisited insights into the promotion of methanol synthesis catalysts by CO2. Catalysis Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cy00573a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.