The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charge carriers in rechargeable batteries: Na ions vs. Li ions
Abstract
We discuss the similarities and dissimilarities of sodium- and lithium-ion batteries in terms of negative and positive electrodes. Compared to the comprehensive body of work on lithium-ion batteries, research on sodium-ion batteries is still at the germination stage. Since both sodium and lithium are alkali metals, they share similar chemical properties including ionicity, electronegativity and electrochemical reactivity. They accordingly have comparable synthetic protocols and electrochemical performances, which indicates that sodium-ion batteries can be successfully developed based on previously applied approaches or methods in the lithium counterpart. The electrode materials in Li-ion batteries provide the best library for research on Na-ion batteries because many Na-ion insertion hosts have their roots in Li-ion insertion hosts. However, the larger size and different bonding characteristics of sodium ions influence the thermodynamic and/or kinetic properties of sodium-ion batteries, which leads to unexpected behaviour in electrochemical performance and reaction mechanism, compared to lithium-ion batteries. This perspective provides a comparative overview of the major developments in the area of positive and negative electrode materials in both Li-ion and Na-ion batteries in the past decade. Highlighted are concepts in solid state chemistry and electrochemistry that have provided new opportunities for tailored design that can be extended to many different electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Battery‐Supercapacitor Hybrid Devices: Recent Progress and Future Prospects
Zuo, W., Li, R., Zhou, C., Li, Y., Xia, J., & Liu, J. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600539 · Cited by 1,637
Zhang, J., Wang, D.-W., Lv, W., Zhang, S., Liang, Q., Zheng, D., Kang, F., & Yang, Q.-H. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee03367a · Cited by 508
Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 @C core–shell nanocomposites for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries
Duan, W., Zhu, Z., Li, H., Hu, Z., Zhang, K., Cheng, F., & Chen, J. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c4ta00106k · Cited by 411
Park, Y., Seo, D., Kim, H., Kim, J., Lee, S., Kim, B., & Kang, K. (2014) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201400561 · Cited by 351
Self-citationLiu, Y., He, X., Hanlon, D., Harvey, A., Coleman, J. N., & Li, Y. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b04577 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, S. Y., Kim, Y., Park, Y., Choi, A., Choi, N.-S., & Lee, K. T.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2067
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2011442509
- Cited by
- 830
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge carriers in rechargeable batteries: Na ions vs. Li ions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ee40811f
- The paper
- Hong, S. Y., Kim, Y., Park, Y., Choi, A., Choi, N.-S., & Lee, K. T. (2013). Charge carriers in rechargeable batteries: Na ions vs. Li ions. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee40811f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.