Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of catalyst material and atomic layer deposited TiO2 oxide thickness on the water oxidation performance of metal–insulator–silicon anodes

Scheuermann, Andrew G., Prange, Jonathan D., Gunji, Marika, Chidsey, Christopher E. D., McIntyre, Paul C.·2013·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

We report on the effects on water oxidation performance of varying (1) the nanoscale TiO2 thickness and (2) the catalyst material in catalyst/TiO2/SiO2/Si anodes. Uniform films of atomic layer deposited TiO2 are prepared in the thickness range ∼1–12 nm on degenerately-doped p+-Si, yielding water oxidation overpotentials at 1 mA cm−2 of 300 mV to 600 mV in aqueous solution (pH 0 to 14). Electron/hole transport through Schottky tunnel junction structures of varying TiO2 thickness was studied using the reversible redox couple ferri/ferrocyanide. The dependence of the water oxidation overpotential on ALD-TiO2 thickness, with all other anode design features unchanged, exhibits a linear trend corresponding to ∼21 mV of added overpotential at 1 mA cm−2 per nanometer of TiO2 for TiO2 thicknesses greater than ∼2 nm. For thinner TiO2 layers, an approximately thickness-independent overpotential is observed. The linear behavior for anodes with thicker TiO2 layers is consistent with the predicted effect of bulk TiO2-limited electronic conduction on the voltage required to sustain the current density across the TiO2/SiO2 insulator stack. Eight different oxygen evolution catalysts of thickness 1–3 nm are studied. For the anodes investigated, 3 nm of Ir or Ru gave the best water oxidation performance, but both thinner layers and other catalysts can be quite effective, suggesting the potential for reduced materials cost. Lastly, a flat band voltage analysis of solid state thin film capacitors was done for five different gate metals on n-Si to probe junction energetics directly relevant to a photoanode. The results are consistent with a Schottky junction in which the Fermi level at the semiconductor surface is unpinned.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3ee41178h

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Scheuermann, A. G., Prange, J. D., Gunji, M., Chidsey, C. E. D., & McIntyre, P. C.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2013
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
2487
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W1981727971
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of catalyst material and atomic layer deposited TiO2 oxide thickness on the water oxidation performance of metal–insulator–silicon anodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ee41178h
The paper
Scheuermann, A. G., Prange, J. D., Gunji, M., Chidsey, C. E. D., & McIntyre, P. C. (2013). Effects of catalyst material and atomic layer deposited TiO2 oxide thickness on the water oxidation performance of metal–insulator–silicon anodes. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee41178h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.