The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards high energy density sodium ion batteries through electrolyte optimization
Abstract
A comprehensive study is reported entailing optimization of sodium ion electrolyte formulation and compatibility studies with positive and negative electrode materials. EC:PC:DMC and EC:PC:DME were found to exhibit optimum ionic conductivities and lower viscosities. Yet, hard carbon negative electrode materials tested in such electrolytes exhibit significant differences in performance, rooted in the different resistivity of the SEI, which results in too large polarization and concomitant loss of capacity at low potentials when DME is used as a co-solvent. EC0.45:PC0.45:DMC0.1 was found to be the optimum composition resulting in good rate capability and high capacity upon sustained cycling for hard carbon electrodes. Its compatibility with positive Na3V2(PO4)2F3 (NVPF) electrodes was also confirmed, which led to the assembly of full Na-ion cells displaying an operation voltage of 3.65 V, very low polarisation and excellent capacity retention upon cycling with ca. 97 mA h g−1 of NVPF after more than 120 cycles together with satisfactory coulombic efficiency (>98.5%) and very good power performance. Such values lead to energy densities comparable to those of the current state-of-the-art lithium-ion technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
From Lithium‐Ion to Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises
Nayak, P. K., Yang, L., Brehm, W., & Adelhelm, P. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201703772 · Cited by 2,674
The Emerging Chemistry of Sodium Ion Batteries for Electrochemical Energy Storage
Kundu, D., Talaie, E., Duffort, V., & Nazar, L. F. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201410376 · Cited by 2,068
Fundamentals, status and promise of sodium-based batteries
Usiskin, R., Lu, Y., Popovic, J., Law, M., Balaya, P., Hu, Y.-S., & Maier, J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00324-w · Cited by 1,370
Recent Advances and Prospects of Cathode Materials for Sodium‐Ion Batteries
Xiang, X., Zhang, K., & Chen, J. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201501527 · Cited by 1,160
Metadata
- Authors
- Ponrouch, A., Dedryvère, R., Monti, D., Demet, A. E., Ateba Mba, J. M., Croguennec, L., Masquelier, C., Johansson, P., & Palacín, M. R.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2361
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2154035368
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.