The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of multivalent ions on renewable energy generation in reverse electrodialysis
Open accessAbstract
Renewable energy can be generated when mixing seawater and river water. This energy is captured in reverse electrodialysis (RED) using ion exchange membranes. Although natural sources of seawater and river water are composed of a mixture of monovalent and multivalent ions, laboratory research on RED is generally performed with artificial solutions of sodium chloride. This research demonstrates that the presence of magnesium- and sulphate ions in feed solutions with NaCl has a major effect on the obtained open circuit voltage and power density for three different membrane types. When using a mixture with a molar fraction of 10% MgSO4 and 90% of NaCl in both feed waters, the experimentally obtained power density in steady state decreases from 29% to 50% compared to the case where the feed solutions contain only NaCl as a salt. This effect is among others explained by the transport of Mg2+ and SO42− against their concentration gradient, as is elaborated in a theoretical framework and which is justified by experimental data. Non-stationary cases, where feed water is switched from a NaCl solution to a mixture of NaCl and MgSO4, show that the voltage response time is in the order of tens of minutes up to several hours, due to ion exchange between the membranes and the feed water. The knowledge gained from electrochemical measurements under stationary and non-stationary conditions and a novel technique to monitor the ion transport inside cation exchange membranes can be used to improve the obtained power density in practical applications of RED using natural feed water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems
Varcoe, J. R., Atanassov, P., Dekel, D. R., Herring, A. M., Hickner, M. A., Kohl, P. A., Kucernak, A. R., Mustain, W. E., Nijmeijer, K., Scott, K., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c4ee01303d · Cited by 2,051
Self-citationSelectivity of ion exchange membranes: A review
Luo, T., Abdu, S., & Wessling, M. (2018) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051 · Cited by 1,123
Recent developments and future perspectives of reverse electrodialysis technology: A review
Mei, Y., & Tang, C. Y. (2018) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.021 · Cited by 499
Bioinspired smart asymmetric nanochannel membranes
Zhang, Z., Wen, L., & Jiang, L. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00688h · Cited by 477
2D materials as an emerging platform for nanopore-based power generation
Macha, M., Marion, S., Nandigana, V. V. R., & Radenovic, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0126-z · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Vermaas, D. A., Veerman, J., Saakes, M., & Nijmeijer, K.
- Venue
- Energy Environ. Sci.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014-01-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1434-1445
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W1982502758
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of multivalent ions on renewable energy generation in reverse electrodialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ee43501f
- The paper
- Vermaas, D. A., Veerman, J., Saakes, M., & Nijmeijer, K. (2014). Influence of multivalent ions on renewable energy generation in reverse electrodialysis. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee43501f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.