Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,123

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selectivity of ion exchange membranes: A review

Luo, Tao, Abdu, Said, Wessling, Matthias·2018·Journal of Membrane Science

Abstract

Abstract Ion exchange membranes (IEMs) have been established as a key component in industrial water desalination and electrolysis processes. Thus, nowadays, they are being studied and developed for application in new energy conversion and storage systems as well as efficient desalination and wastewater treatment processes. These processes include redox flow batteries, reverse electrodialysis, membrane capacitive deionization, microbial fuel cells, and ion exchange membrane bioreactors. Ion permselectivity between counter- and co-ions, the most essential property in IEMs, makes these processes possible and/or efficient. Additionally, ion selectivity between different counter-ions is required for these novel processes to be efficient. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ion exchange membrane permselectivity by summarizing the developments in this field over the past decade. Membrane microstructure and possible mechanisms for ion transport in the membrane phase are discussed with respect to permselectivity, along with the influence of current density and related membrane-solution boundary conditions. A selectivity order for the transport of common anions through conventional anion exchange membranes (AEMs) is generalized, the same is done for cation transport through conventional cation exchange membranes (CEMs). Two types of experimental methods for the determination of ion permselectivity: electrodialysis and the membrane potential method, are summarized. Finally, relevant membrane preparation methods and surface modification of IEMs reported over the past decade are classified and discussed. In summary, we conclude that synthetic methods have evolved rapidly; however, development of fundamental knowledge on the many complex phenomena occurring in the adaptive membrane bulk and solution-interface environments is not sufficiently established. Thus, much effort is required to combine experimental, theoretical, and simulation data for a more comprehensive and coherent understanding of these phenomena.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 146 references

Cited by

See all 1,123

Metadata

Authors
Luo, T., Abdu, S., & Wessling, M.
Venue
Journal of Membrane Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
555
Pages
429-454
ISSN
0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793421145
Cited by
1,123
References
146
FWCI
37.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selectivity of ion exchange membranes: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051
The paper
Luo, T., Abdu, S., & Wessling, M. (2018). Selectivity of ion exchange membranes: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.