Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of flow in green chemistry and engineering

Open access
Newman, Stephen G., Jensen, Klavs F.·2013·Green Chemistry
DOI 10.1039/c3gc40374b
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Flow chemistry and continuous processing can offer many ways to make synthesis a more sustainable practice. These technologies help bridge the large gap between academic and industrial settings by often providing a more reproducible, scalable, safe and efficient option for performing chemical reactions. In this review, we use selected examples to demonstrate how continuous methods of synthesis can be greener than batch synthesis on a small and a large scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3gc40374b

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Newman, S. G., & Jensen, K. F.
Venue
Green Chemistry
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2013
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1456
ISSN
  • 1463-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9270
DOI
10.1039/c3gc40374b
OpenAlex
W1541612385
Cited by
550
References
2
FWCI
28.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of flow in green chemistry and engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3gc40374b
The paper
Newman, S. G., & Jensen, K. F. (2013). The role of flow in green chemistry and engineering. Green Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3gc40374b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.