The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical considerations for the determination of nanoparticle number concentrations, size and number size distributions by single particle ICP-MS
Open accessAbstract
The metrological criteria for the implementation of the single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SP-ICPMS) methodology applied to nanoparticle size characterization and quantification have been investigated. The SP-ICPMS basis involves a process of counting events corresponding to individual nanoparticles, which requires (i) isolation of the contribution of the nanoparticles from that of the background/dissolved analyte, and (ii) avoiding the occurrence of multiple-nanoparticle events. A criterion based on three times the standard deviation of the continuous background (3σ) was selected as the threshold for discrimination of nanoparticle events from the background. Because the detectability of nanoparticles depends on both the size and number concentration, this 3σ criterion was also selected for detection of nanoparticles at the size detection limit and concentrations over the number concentration detection limit. However, at very low number concentrations, a less restrictive criterion must be used. The selection of a critical nanoparticle number concentration, based on the sample introduction and data acquisition parameters, allows the minimization of the occurrence of multiple-nanoparticle events, as well as controlling of the precision associated with the counting of nanoparticle events. Under such conditions, the standard uncertainty associated with the determination of number concentrations was 5%. The uncertainty for the determination of nanoparticle diameters was also studied, varying from 3 to 10% for diameters in the range of 100–40 nm, respectively. Reliable average number concentrations and sizes were obtained, although the number size distributions showed a significant broadening contribution due to the SP-ICPMS measurement process. The feasibility of SP-ICPMS for the implementation of the European Commission definition of 'nanomaterial' was studied by analyzing commercial silver nanoparticle suspensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoparticle Size Detection Limits by Single Particle ICP-MS for 40 Elements
Lee, S., Bi, X., Reed, R. B., Ranville, J. F., Herckes, P., & Westerhoff, P. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502422v · Cited by 448
Kreider, M. E., Maldonado Santos, A. R., Clauser, A. L., Berlinger, S. A., Ha, M.-A., Volk, E. K., Rasmussen, Z., Bassinger, M., Cruz, L. C., Baez-Cotto, C. M., et al. (2026) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5c20325 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Laborda, F., Jiménez-Lamana, J., Bolea, E., & Castillo, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1220
- ISSN
- 0267-9477 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5544
- OpenAlex
- W2049642520
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical considerations for the determination of nanoparticle number concentrations, size and number size distributions by single particle ICP-MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ja50100k
- The paper
- Laborda, F., Jiménez-Lamana, J., Bolea, E., & Castillo, J. R. (2013). Critical considerations for the determination of nanoparticle number concentrations, size and number size distributions by single particle ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ja50100k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.