Cited by 38Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Protein–protein interaction analysis in single microfluidic droplets using FRET and fluorescence lifetime detection

Benz, Christian, Retzbach, Heiko, Nagl, Stefan, Belder, Detlev·2013·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility of a protein-protein interaction analysis and reaction progress monitoring in microfluidic droplets using FRET and microscopic fluorescence lifetime measurements. The fabrication of microdroplet chips using soft- and photolithographic techniques is demonstrated and the resulting chips reliably generate microdroplets of 630 pL and 6.71 nL at frequencies of 7.9 and 0.75 Hz, respectively. They were used for detection of protein-protein interactions in microdroplets using a model system of Alexa Fluor 488 labelled biotinylated BSA, Alexa Fluor 594 labelled streptavidin and unlabelled chicken egg white avidin. These microchips could be used for quantitative detection of avidin and streptavidin in microdroplets in direct and competitive assay formats with nanomolar detection limits, corresponding to attomole protein amounts. Four droplets were found to be sufficient for analytical determination. Fluorescence intensity ratio and fluorescence lifetime measurements were performed and compared for microdroplet FRET determination. A competitive on-chip binding assay for determination of unlabelled avidin using fluorescence lifetime detection could be performed within 135 s only.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3lc00057e

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benz, C., Retzbach, H., Nagl, S., & Belder, D.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Belder, Detlev
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2013
Volume
13
Issue
14
Pages
2808
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2112012211
Cited by
38
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lab on a Chip (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Freistaat Sachsen
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, microfluidic droplets, fluorescence resonance energy transfer, droplet formation, avidin, streptavidin, competitive binding assay, nanomolar detection limit, fluorescence intensity ratio
MeSH terms
Avidin, Biotin, Equipment Design, Fluorometry, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Protein Binding, Serum Albumin, Bovine, Time Factors, Microscopy, Confocal, Streptavidin, Protein Interaction Mapping, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review