The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CMCTS stabilized Fe3O4 particles with extremely low toxicity as highly efficient near-infrared photothermal agents for in vivo tumor ablation
Abstract
With the potential uses of photothermal therapy (PTT) in cancer treatment with excellent efficacy, and the growing concerns about the nanotoxicity of hyperthermia agents such as carbon nanotubes and gold-based nanomaterials, the importance of searching for a biocompatible hyperthermia agent cannot be emphasized too much. In this work, a novel promising hyperthermia agent employing magnetic Fe3O4 particles with fairly low toxicity was proposed. This hyperthermia agent showed rapid heat generation under NIR irradiation. After modification with carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCTS), the obtained Fe3O4@CMCTS particles could disperse stably in PBS and serum without any aggregation. The modification of CMCTS could decrease the adsorption of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and improve the cellular uptake. In a comparative study with hollow gold nanospheres (HAuNS), Fe3O4@CMCTS particles exhibited a comparable photothermal effect and fairly low cytotoxicity. The in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) images of mice revealed that by attaching a magnet to the tumor, Fe3O4@CMCTS particles accumulated in the tumor after intravenous injection and showed a low distribution in the liver. After being exposed to a 808 nm laser for 5 min at a low power density of 1.5 W cm(-2), the tumors on Fe3O4@CMCTS-injected mice reached a temperature of ~52 °C and were completely destroyed. Thus, a kind of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticle with extremely low toxicity and a simple structure for simultaneous MR imaging, targeted drug delivery and photothermal therapy can be easily fabricated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Second window for in vivo imaging
Smith, A. M., Mancini, M. C., & Nie, S. (2009) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.326 · Cited by 2,848
Biomaterials: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going
Ratner, B. D., & Bryant, S. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140027 · Cited by 1,507
Cited by
Espinosa, A., Di Corato, R., Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J., Flaud, P., Pellegrino, T., & Wilhelm, C. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b07249 · Cited by 788
Versatile Types of Organic/Inorganic Nanohybrids: From Strategic Design to Biomedical Applications
Zhao, N., Yan, L., Zhao, X., Chen, X., Li, A., Zheng, D., Zhou, X., Dai, X., & Xu, F.-J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00401 · Cited by 429
Recent advances and future prospects of iron oxide nanoparticles in biomedicine and diagnostics
Vallabani, N. V. S., & Singh, S. (2018) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-018-1286-z · Cited by 322
Datta, N. R., Krishnan, S., Speiser, D. E., Neufeld, E., Kuster, N., Bodis, S., & Hofmann, H. (2016) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.09.016 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, S., Kong, F., Guo, X., Wu, L., Shen, H., Xie, M., Wang, X., Jin, Y., & Ge, Y.
- Venue
- Nanoscale
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 8056
- ISSN
- 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-3372
- OpenAlex
- W2160493097
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CMCTS stabilized Fe3O4 particles with extremely low toxicity as highly efficient near-infrared photothermal agents for in vivo tumor ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3nr01447a
- The paper
- Shen, S., Kong, F., Guo, X., Wu, L., Shen, H., Xie, M., Wang, X., Jin, Y., & Ge, Y. (2013). CMCTS stabilized Fe3O4 particles with extremely low toxicity as highly efficient near-infrared photothermal agents for in vivo tumor ablation. Nanoscale. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr01447a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.