Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative study on chemical composition of various biomass species

Open access
Rabemanolontsoa, Harifara, Saka, Shiro·2013·RSC Advances

Abstract

In this study, the chemical composition of 32 samples coming from 29 different biomass species including a gymnosperm, 2 dicotyledonous angiosperms, 17 monocotyledonous angiosperms and 9 algae species was successfully determined using an established method applicable to analyze various biomass species. The obtained data allowed a direct comparison of the biomass in their chemical composition. It was, thus, revealed that although the chemical composition differed from one species to another, and even from different parts of the same plants, similar trends were found in the composition of biomass species belonging to the same taxonomic group. Based on those results, it was clarified that the chemical composition of a biomass sample is related to its taxonomy. Therefore, typical chemical composition for each taxonomic group was proposed and the potential of each group for different biorefinery platforms could be defined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3ra22958k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Rabemanolontsoa, H., & Saka, S.
Venue
RSC Advances
Published
2013
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
3946
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010405804
Cited by
215
References
1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study on chemical composition of various biomass species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ra22958k
The paper
Rabemanolontsoa, H., & Saka, S. (2013). Comparative study on chemical composition of various biomass species. RSC Advances. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra22958k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.