The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Size-controlled silver nanoparticles synthesized over the range 5–100 nm using the same protocol and their antibacterial efficacy
Open accessAbstract
A systematic and detailed study for size-specific antibacterial efficacy of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) synthesized using a co-reduction approach is presented here. Nucleation and growth kinetics during the synthesis process was precisely controlled and AgNPs of average size 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 30, 50, 63, 85, and 100 nm were synthesized with good yield and monodispersity. We found the bacteriostatic/bactericidal effect of AgNPs to be size and dose-dependent as determined by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of silver nanoparticles against four bacterial strains. Out of the tested strains, Escherichia coli MTCC 443 and Staphylococcus aureus NCIM 5201 were found to be the most and least sensitive strains regardless of AgNP size. For AgNPs with less than 10 nm size, the antibacterial efficacy was significantly enhanced as revealed through delayed bacterial growth kinetics, corresponding MIC/MBC values and disk diffusion tests. AgNPs of the smallest size, i.e., 5 nm demonstrated the best results and mediated the fastest bactericidal activity against all the tested strains compared to AgNPs having 7 nm and 10 nm sizes at similar bacterial concentrations. TEM analysis of AgNP treated bacterial cells showed the presence of AgNPs on the cell membrane, and AgNPs internalized within the cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hybrid antimicrobial enzyme and silver nanoparticle coatings for medical instruments
Eby, D. M., Luckarift, H. R., & Johnson, G. R. (2009) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am9002155 · Cited by 248
Cited by
Nayak, D., Ashe, S., Rauta, P. R., Kumari, M., & Nayak, B. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.022 · Cited by 332
da Silva, A. G. M., Rodrigues, T. S., Haigh, S. J., & Camargo, P. H. C. (2017) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c7cc02352a · Cited by 312
Nitric oxide–releasing macromolecular scaffolds for antibacterial applications
Yang, L., Feura, E. S., Ahonen, M. J. R., & Schoenfisch, M. H. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201800155 · Cited by 218
Nguyen, D. D., & Lai, J.-Y. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.134970 · Cited by 178
Izak-Nau, E., Huk, A., Reidy, B., Uggerud, H., Vadset, M., Eiden, S., Voetz, M., Himly, M., Duschl, A., Dusinska, M., et al. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra10187e · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Agnihotri, S., Mukherji, S., & Mukherji, S.
- Venue
- RSC Adv.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3974-3983
- ISSN
- 2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979020653
- Cited by
- 1,872
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size-controlled silver nanoparticles synthesized over the range 5–100 nm using the same protocol and their antibacterial efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ra44507k
- The paper
- Agnihotri, S., Mukherji, S., & Mukherji, S. (2014). Size-controlled silver nanoparticles synthesized over the range 5–100 nm using the same protocol and their antibacterial efficacy. RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44507k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.