Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Precise determination of the Poisson ratio in soft materials with 2D digital image correlation

Open access
Pritchard, Robyn H., Lava, Pascal, Debruyne, Dimitri, Terentjev, Eugene M.·2013·Soft Matter

Abstract

In this article, we demonstrate the application of digital image correlation (DIC) in evaluating the strains and Poisson ratio of a range of soft materials in terms of their spatial and temporal resolutions. Homogeneous samples of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer were used as control substance and were measured to have Poisson ratios of 0.498, 0.503, 0.500, and 0.499, in agreement with the reported incompressible value of 0.50. Two carbon nanotube (CNT) elastomer composites of identical composition, but one of a homogeneous and the other of a highly inhomogeneous CNT distribution, were used to determine the spatial resolution with good results. The relaxation of a polydomain liquid crystal elastomer (3D-LCE), a cholesteric liquid crystal elastomer (CLCE), and a polyacrylamide gel (PAAm) in water, were used to determine the temporal resolution of the technique. A video at 25 fps was used to evaluate the time dependence of the 3D-LCE over which time an increase in the Poisson ratio was observed. The 3D-LCE relaxes from its initial state at 0.42 to 0.50, converging towards incompressibility at equilibrium. The CLCE was found to have a similar initial value of 0.44 but converged to ∼0.60, a consequence of its anisotropic elastic nature. PAAm gel relaxation in water was studied over a time period of 7 hours with digital images taken periodically every minute. Its Poisson ratio was found to decrease smoothly from 0.50 to 0.26, with an accompanying reduction in force. The equilibrium result compares well to the 0.25 value predicted by a theory of the strain-induced swelling of dilute gels. In summary, we find DIC to be a powerful and easy to implement method of accurately measuring local strains in a range of soft materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3sm50901j

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Pritchard, R. H., Lava, P., Debruyne, D., & Terentjev, E. M.
Venue
Soft Matter
Published
2013
Volume
9
Issue
26
Pages
6037
ISSN
  • 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6848
OpenAlex
W2089687846
Cited by
207
References
2
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precise determination of the Poisson ratio in soft materials with 2D digital image correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3sm50901j
The paper
Pritchard, R. H., Lava, P., Debruyne, D., & Terentjev, E. M. (2013). Precise determination of the Poisson ratio in soft materials with 2D digital image correlation. Soft Matter. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm50901j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.