Cited by 71Subcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesHeat transfer and supercritical fluids

Combining experiment and theory to elucidate the role of supercritical water in sulfide decomposition

Kida, Yuko, Class, Caleb A., Concepcion, Anthony J., Timko, Michael T., Green, William H.·2014·Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

Abstract

The cleavage of C-S linkages plays a key role in fuel processing and organic geochemistry. Water is known to affect these processes, and several hypotheses have been proposed, but the mechanism has been elusive. Here we use both experiment and theory to demonstrate that supercritical water reacts with intermediates formed during alkyl sulfide decomposition. During hexyl sulfide decomposition in supercritical water, pentane and CO + CO2 were detected in addition to the expected six carbon products. A multi-step reaction sequence for hexyl sulfide reacting with supercritical water is proposed which explains the surprising products, and quantum chemical calculations provide quantitative rates that support the proposed mechanism. The key sequence is cleavage of one C-S bond to form a thioaldehyde via radical reactions, followed by a pericyclic addition of water to the C[double bond, length as m-dash]S bond to form a geminal mercaptoalcohol. The mercaptoalcohol decomposes into an aldehyde and H2S either directly or via a water-catalyzed 6-membered ring transition state. The aldehyde quickly decomposes into CO plus pentane by radical reactions. The time is ripe for quantitative modelling of organosulfur reaction kinetics based on modern quantum chemistry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4cp00711e

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kida, Y., Class, C. A., Concepcion, A. J., Timko, M. T., & Green, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Corresponding author
Green, William H.
Venue
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
Published
2014
Volume
16
Issue
20
Pages
9220-9228
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W2124075192
Cited by
71
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons @ Butler University (Butler University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Saudi Aramco
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
Keywords
supercritical water, alkyl sulfides, C–S bond cleavage, reaction mechanism, thioaldehydes, radical reactions, fuel processing, quantum chemical calculations
MeSH terms
Kinetics, Quantum Theory, Sulfides, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review