The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational design of a metal–organic framework host for sulfur storage in fast, long-cycle Li–S batteries
Abstract
Unlike an intercalation cathode, which has an intrinsic host structure made of redox metal sites allowing the transport of Li+/e−, sulfur as a conversion cathode requires an additional host to store and immobilize the mobile redox centers, polysulfides. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as a class of highly porous and well-defined crystalline materials are a promising platform to search for an effective host through rational design. With the appropriate selection of an electrolyte and a cutoff voltage range, sulfur stored in an appropriate MOF host can take advantage of both intercalation (fast and stable) and conversion (high energy density) cathodes. Herein, we describe a fast cathode with long cycle life based on sulfur and ZIF-8 nanocrystals. With 30 wt% sulfur loading in the electrode, it achieves remarkable discharge capacities of 1055 mA h g−1 (based on sulfur) at 0.1 C and 710 mA h g−1 at 1 C. The decay over 300 cycles at 0.5 C is 0.08% per cycle, prominent in long-cycle Li–S batteries. By comparing with another three distinct MOFs, MIL-53 (Al), NH2-MIL-53 (Al) and HKUST-1, as well as two sets of ZIF-8 with particle sizes in the micrometer range, it reveals that (i) the small particle size of the MOF host is appreciable to achieve a high capacity and (ii) small apertures, associated with functionalities in the open framework that have affinity with the polysulfide anions, can help achieve a stable cycling. We believe that the findings are general and applicable for the rational design of new hosts for sulfur in other porous material families to produce more effective and stable Li–S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Mao, Y., Li, G., Guo, Y., Li, Z., Liang, C., Peng, X., & Lin, Z. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14628 · Cited by 518
Zn-doped Ni-MOF material with a high supercapacitive performance
Yang, J., Zheng, C., Xiong, P., Li, Y., & Wei, M. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c4ta04346d · Cited by 508
Ng, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, J., Li, R., Fan, X., Chen, Y., Han, R., Li, W., Zheng, J., Wang, B., & Li, X.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2715
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2119504742
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational design of a metal–organic framework host for sulfur storage in fast, long-cycle Li–S batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c4ee01382d
- The paper
- Zhou, J., Li, R., Fan, X., Chen, Y., Han, R., Li, W., Zheng, J., Wang, B., & Li, X. (2014). Rational design of a metal–organic framework host for sulfur storage in fast, long-cycle Li–S batteries. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee01382d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.