Cited by 282Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

MoO2 nanobelts@nitrogen self-doped MoS2 nanosheets as effective electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction

Zhou, Weijia, Hou, Dongman, Sang, Yuanhua, Yao, Shuhua, Zhou, Jian, Li, Guoqiang, Li, Ligui, Liu, Hong +1 more·2014·Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Abstract

Advanced materials for electrocatalytic water splitting are central to renewable energy research. In this study, MoO2 nanobelts@nitrogen self-doped MoS2 nanosheets are produced by nitridation and sulfuration treatments of MoO3 nanobelts. The material structures are characterized by a variety of techniques including scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Raman scattering, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction spectroscopy. It is found that because of nitrogen doping and the abundance of exposed active edges, the heterostructures exhibit high electronic conductivity, and more importantly, enhanced and stable electrocatalytic activity in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), as manifested in electrochemical studies. The onset potential is found to be only −156 mV (vs. RHE), which is 105 mV more positive than that of pure MoS2 under identical experimental conditions. The corresponding Tafel slope is estimated to be 47.5 mV dec−1, even slightly less than that of commercial 10 wt% Pt/C (49.8 mV dec−1), suggesting that the reaction dynamics is largely determined by the electrochemical desorption of hydrogen. This is accounted for by nitrogen doping that leads to an enhanced electronic conductivity of the heterostructures as well as a high density of spinning electron states around the N and Mo atoms in MoS2 nanosheets that are the active sites for HER, as manifested in density functional theory studies of a N-doped MoS2 monolayer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4ta01898b

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, W., Hou, D., Sang, Y., Yao, S., Zhou, J., Li, G., Li, L., Liu, H., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures (CN)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Weijia
  • Chen, Shaowei
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Published
2014
Volume
2
Issue
29
Pages
11358
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
OpenAlex
W2119799648
Cited by
282
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 3
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Materials Chemistry A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, MoS2 nanosheets, heterostructures, electrocatalysts, electrochemical water splitting, nitridation, sulfuration, electronic conductivity, hydrogen desorption, Tafel slope, turn-on voltage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review