Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solvent effects in catalysis: rational improvements of catalysts via manipulation of solvent interactions

Open access
Dyson, Paul J., Jessop, Philip G.·2016·Catalysis Science & Technology
DOI 10.1039/c5cy02197a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The interactions of solvents with catalysts, substrates and products all influence the rate and selectivity of reactions and should be considered to ensure a reaction is run under optimum conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c5cy02197a

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Dyson, P. J., & Jessop, P. G.
Venue
Catalysis Science & Technology
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2016
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
3302-3316
ISSN
  • 2044-4753 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-4761
DOI
10.1039/c5cy02197a
OpenAlex
W2280367163
Cited by
382
References
57
FWCI
14.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solvent effects in catalysis: rational improvements of catalysts via manipulation of solvent interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c5cy02197a
The paper
Dyson, P. J., & Jessop, P. G. (2016). Solvent effects in catalysis: rational improvements of catalysts via manipulation of solvent interactions. Catalysis Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cy02197a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.