Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review: carbon onions for electrochemical energy storage

Open access
Zeiger, Marco, Jäckel, Nicolas, Mochalin, Vadym N., Presser, Volker·2016·Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Abstract

Carbon onions are a relatively new member of the carbon nanomaterials family. They consist of multiple concentric fullerene-like carbon shells which are highly defective and disordered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c5ta08295a

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Zeiger, M., Jäckel, N., Mochalin, V. N., & Presser, V.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Published
2016
Volume
4
Issue
9
Pages
3172-3196
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
OpenAlex
W2196236460
Cited by
474
References
67
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review: carbon onions for electrochemical energy storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c5ta08295a
The paper
Zeiger, M., Jäckel, N., Mochalin, V. N., & Presser, V. (2016). Review: carbon onions for electrochemical energy storage. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta08295a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.