Cited by 238Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesCrystallography and molecular interactionsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

The S66x8 benchmark for noncovalent interactions revisited: explicitly correlated ab initio methods and density functional theory

Open access
Brauer, Brina, Kesharwani, Manoj K., Kozuch, Sebastian, Martin, Jan M. L.·2016·Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Abstract

The S66x8 dataset for noncovalent interactions of biochemical relevance has been re-examined by means of CCSD(F12*)(T), DFT, and SAPT methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6cp00688d

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • COMP6 contains five rigorous benchmarks covering broad regions of organic and bio-chemical space of isolated molecules and a sixth built from the existing S66x8 noncovalent and intermolecular interactions data.

    “COMP6 is a benchmark suite containing five rigorous benchmarks that cover broad regions of organic and bio-chemical space of isolated molecules and a sixth built from the existing S66x8195 noncovalent and intermolecular interactions data.191”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [195]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 111 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brauer, B., Kesharwani, M. K., Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Martin, Jan M. L.
Venue
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2016
Volume
18
Issue
31
Pages
20905-20925
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W2288881701
Cited by
238
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 10
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Minerva Foundation (N/A)
  • Israel Science Foundation (1358/15)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Crystallography and molecular interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
non-covalent interactions, dispersion correction, MP2-F12, CCSD(T)-F12, double hybrids, M06-2X, symmetry-adapted perturbation theory, counterpoise correction, basis set convergence, explicitly correlated methods, biochemical interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review