The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transferrin conjugated nontoxic carbon dots for doxorubicin delivery to target pediatric brain tumor cells
Abstract
Among various cancers, pediatric brain tumors represent the most common cancer type in children and the second most common cause of cancer related deaths. Anticancer drugs and therapies, such as doxorubicin (Dox), have severe side effects on patients during chemotherapy, especially for children as their bodies are still under development. These side effects are believed to be due to the lack of a delivery system with high efficacy and targeting selectivity, resulting in serious damages of normal cells. To improve the efficacy and selectivity, the transferrin (Trans) receptor mediated endocytosis can be utilized for drug delivery system design, as transferrin receptors are expressed on the blood brain barrier (BBB) and often over expressed in brain tumor cells. Carbon dots (C-Dots) have recently emerged as benign nanoparticles in biomedical applications owing to their good water solubility, tunable surface functionalities and excellent biocompatibility. The unique characteristics of C-Dots make them promising candidates for drug delivery development. In this study, carbon dots-transferrin-doxorubicin covalent conjugate (C-Dots-Trans-Dox) was synthesized, characterized by different spectroscopic techniques and investigated for the potential application as a drug delivery system for anticancer drug doxorubicin to treat pediatric brain tumors. Our in vitro results demonstrate greater uptake of the C-Dots-Trans-Dox conjugate compared to Dox alone presumably owing to the high levels of transferrin receptors on these tumor cells. Experiment showed that C-Dots-Trans-Dox at 10 nM was significantly more cytotoxic than Dox alone, reducing viability by 14-45%, across multiple pediatric brain tumor cell lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crossing the blood-brain barrier with nanoparticles
Zhou, Y., Peng, Z., Seven, E. S., & Leblanc, R. M. (2018) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.12.015 · Cited by 837
Self-citationHersh, A. M., Alomari, S., & Tyler, B. M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23084153 · Cited by 478
Tumor microenvironment-responsive intelligent nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Gong, F., Yang, N., Wang, X., Zhao, Q., Chen, Q., Liu, Z., & Cheng, L. (2020) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100851 · Cited by 359
Photonic Carbon Dots as an Emerging Nanoagent for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications
Chung, Y. J., Kim, J., & Park, C. B. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c02114 · Cited by 299
Triple conjugated carbon dots as a nano-drug delivery model for glioblastoma brain tumors
Hettiarachchi, S. D., Graham, R. M., Mintz, K. J., Zhou, Y., Vanni, S., Peng, Z., & Leblanc, R. M. (2019) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c8nr08970a · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, S., Amat, D., Peng, Z., Vanni, S., Raskin, S., De Angulo, G., Othman, A. M., Graham, R. M., & Leblanc, R. M.
- Venue
- Nanoscale
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 16662-16669
- ISSN
- 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-3372
- OpenAlex
- W2517072728
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transferrin conjugated nontoxic carbon dots for doxorubicin delivery to target pediatric brain tumor cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6nr05055g
- The paper
- Li, S., Amat, D., Peng, Z., Vanni, S., Raskin, S., De Angulo, G., Othman, A. M., Graham, R. M., & Leblanc, R. M. (2016). Transferrin conjugated nontoxic carbon dots for doxorubicin delivery to target pediatric brain tumor cells. Nanoscale. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr05055g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.